Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IGM vs XNTK: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IGM returned +21.7% to XNTK's +24.9%; 45% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IGM and XNTK
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $11.0bn for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF and $1.9bn for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF.
Pair scorecard
XNTK costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.2 points; IGM is 5.8 times larger.
| Measure | IGM | XNTK |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +21.7% | +24.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 6.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 6.9%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index | NYSE Technology Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $11.0bn | $1.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 45% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 56.8% | 48.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Mar 30, 2001 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,334 weekly returnsIGM returned slightly more: +1,968.5% to +1,867.3%. IGM swung slightly less: 23.5% to 25.0%. IGM and XNTK fell about the same at their worst: −62.6% and −63.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IGM | XNTK | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +1,968.5% | +1,867.3% | IGM (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +12.5% | +12.3% | Tie | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +1,744.2% | +1,217.1% | IGM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 23.5% | 25.0% | IGM (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 16.1% | 17.2% | IGM (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −62.6% | −63.2% | Tie | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.55 | 0.52 | IGM (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.80 | 0.75 | IGM (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.20 | 0.19 | IGM (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,334 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IGM and XNTK hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
45% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IGM and XNTK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IGM and XNTK are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. IGM follows S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index and XNTK follows NYSE Technology Index.
- Holdings in common. 45% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IGM returned +21.7% and XNTK +24.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.2 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IGM
IGM tracks an index of Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 56.8%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XNTK
XNTK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 35 positions, with the top ten at 48.1%. It sat 6.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IGM or XNTK?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +21.7% and XNTK +24.9%.
- Which is cheaper, IGM or XNTK?
- XNTK is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IGM against XNTK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igm-vs-xntk
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IGM against XNTK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igm-vs-xntk
[IGM against XNTK (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igm-vs-xntk)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.