Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IYW vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IYW returned +23.2% to VGT's +24.7%; 83% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IYW and VGT

Net assets: $25.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares U.S. Technology ETF, and $154.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Information Tech ETF.

At a glance
+23.2%
IYW total return, 1 year
+24.7%
VGT total return, 1 year
0.37%
IYW expense ratio
0.09%
VGT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGT costs 0.28 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.5 points; VGT is 5.8 times larger.

IYW vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIYWVGT
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.2%+24.7%
Drawdown
Below its high5.5%, high on Oct 6, 20264.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 Technology RIC 22MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.37%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$26.5bn$154.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common83%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund65.1%63.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Feb 6, 2004 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,185 weekly returns
IYW VGT
Return
Total return edge VGT (slight) +2,204.9% +2,280.1%
Annualized edge Tie +14.8% +14.9%
Price return edge Tie +1,887.4% +1,863.7%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 21.4% 21.2%
Max drawdown edge Tie −52.3% −52.4%
Downside capture 116.0% 99.9%
Beta 1.19 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.67 0.68
Sortino edge Tie 0.98 0.99
Treynor 0.088 0.201
Calmar edge Tie 0.28 0.28
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.9% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.32 0.80
Information ratio 0.17 0.19
Tracking error 14.2% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: IYW against IWB, May 26, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026; VGT against FTEC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VGT returned slightly more: +2,280.1% to +2,204.9%. IYW and VGT swung about the same: 21.4% and 21.2%. IYW and VGT fell about the same at their worst: −52.3% and −52.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IYW vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIYWVGTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+2,204.9%+2,280.1%VGT (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.8%+14.9%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,887.4%+1,863.7%TiePrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.4%21.2%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.5%14.4%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−52.3%−52.4%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture146.1%100.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture116.0%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.191.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.701.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.670.68TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.980.99TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0880.201Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.280.28TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWBFTECThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.9% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.320.80Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−4.4% to +6.1%−0.2% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.170.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error14.2%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,185 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

83%

By the books each fund has filed, IYW and VGT hold 83% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

83% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IYW VGT
NVIDIA 16.81% 17.58%
APPLE 16.60% 15.91%
MICROSOFT 13.07% 11.16%
BROADCOM INC 3.14% 4.11%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.04% 3.67%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.73% 4.45%
INTEL CORPORATION 2.12% 1.98%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 2.18% 1.55%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 1.55% 1.53%
LAM RESEARCH 1.49% 1.55%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 1.60% 1.24%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 1.33% 1.02%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IYW
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.02%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.38%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.92%
DOORDASH CLASS A 0.32%
APPLOVIN CLASS A 0.31%
LEIDOS HOLDINGS 0.09%
REDDIT CLASS A 0.09%
SS AND C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS 0.08%
Only in VGT
Cisco Systems Inc 1.60%
Arista Networks Inc 0.85%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.79%
Accenture PLC 0.45%
Motorola Solutions Inc 0.31%
Lumentum Holdings Inc 0.30%
Keysight Technologies Inc 0.27%
TE Connectivity PLC 0.27%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF VGT Vanguard Information Tech ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of U.S. Technology Tracks an index of Information technology
Total return, 1 year +23.2% +24.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +25.0% (FTEC)
Gap to its benchmark +10.1 pts vs IWB −0.3 pts vs FTEC
Expense ratio 0.37% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 94.3% 86.8%
Holdings 150 320
Net assets, IYW as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 $25.0bn $154.5bn

IYW and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-00B432E325

IYW and VGT are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. IYW follows Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22 and VGT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50.
  2. Cost. IYW charges 0.37% of assets a year and VGT 0.09%, a gap of 0.28 points.
  3. Size. IYW has $26.5bn in net assets and VGT $154.5bn (net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026); VGT is 5.8 times larger.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IYW flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IYW

IYW tracks an index of U.S. Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 65.1%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VGT

VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYW or VGT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYW returned +23.2% and VGT +24.7%.
Which is cheaper, IYW or VGT?
VGT is cheaper, by 0.28 percentage points a year. That is about $28 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYW and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of IYW and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IYW against VGT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iyw-vs-vgt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.