Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

VGT vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VGT returned +24.7% to XLK's +27.1%; 85% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about VGT and XLK

Net assets: $154.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Information Tech ETF, and $125.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+24.7%
VGT total return, 1 year
+27.1%
XLK total return, 1 year
0.09%
VGT expense ratio
0.08%
XLK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLK costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.4 points; VGT is 1.2 times larger.

VGT vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVGTXLK
Return
Total return, 1 year+24.7%+27.1%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 20265.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50Technology Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.08%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$154.5bn$127.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common85%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund63.6%64.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Feb 6, 2004 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,185 weekly returns
VGT XLK
Return
Total return edge VGT (slight) +2,280.1% +2,212.1%
Annualized edge Tie +14.9% +14.8%
Price return edge VGT +1,863.7% +1,626.1%
Risk
Volatility edge XLK (slight) 21.2% 20.4%
Max drawdown edge XLK (slight) −52.4% −50.7%
Downside capture 99.9% 113.0%
Beta 1.00 1.15
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.68 0.69
Sortino edge XLK (slight) 0.99 1.02
Treynor 0.201 0.094
Calmar edge XLK (slight) 0.28 0.29
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.1% a year +1.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.80 0.67
Information ratio 0.19 0.22
Tracking error 0.7% 12.6%

Each against its own benchmark: VGT against FTEC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; XLK against SPY, Dec 31, 1998 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VGT returned slightly more: +2,280.1% to +2,212.1%. XLK swung slightly less: 20.4% to 21.2%. XLK fell slightly less at its worst: −50.7% to −52.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: VGT vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVGTXLKEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+2,280.1%+2,212.1%VGT (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.9%+14.8%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,863.7%+1,626.1%VGTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.2%20.4%XLK (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.4%13.8%XLK (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−52.4%−50.7%XLK (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture100.0%138.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.9%113.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.15Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.73Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.680.69TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.991.02XLK (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.2010.094Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.280.29XLK (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkFTECSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.1% a year+1.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.800.67Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.2% to +0.5%−3.0% to +6.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.190.22Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.7%12.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,185 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

85%

By the books each fund has filed, VGT and XLK hold 85% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

85% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first VGT XLK
NVIDIA Corp 17.58% 15.22%
Apple Inc 15.91% 14.62%
Microsoft Corp 11.16% 11.38%
Broadcom Inc 4.11% 4.70%
Micron Technology Inc 4.45% 4.02%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.67% 4.78%
Intel Corp 1.98% 2.72%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.60% 2.56%
Lam Research Corp 1.55% 1.76%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.55% 2.67%
Applied Materials Inc 1.53% 1.84%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.24% 1.91%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in VGT
Snowflake Inc 0.45%
Cloudflare Inc 0.45%
Astera Labs Inc 0.23%
Okta Inc 0.19%
SLBBH1142 0.18%
Strategy Inc 0.16%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.15%
Atlassian Corp 0.15%
Only in XLK
XAK TECHNOLOGY DEC26 0.00%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

VGT Vanguard Information Tech ETF XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Information technology Tracks an index of Technology
Total return, 1 year +24.7% +27.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +25.0% (FTEC) +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark −0.3 pts vs FTEC +13.5 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 86.8% 99.9%
Holdings 320 76
Net assets, VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 and XLK as of Oct 27, 2026 $154.5bn $125.0bn

VGT and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-B0EE233B3F

VGT and XLK are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. VGT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50 and XLK follows Technology Select Sector Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 VGT returned +24.7% and XLK +27.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.4 points.
  3. Number of holdings. VGT holds 320 positions and XLK holds 76.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

XLK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
VGT

VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLK

XLK tracks an index of Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VGT or XLK?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VGT returned +24.7% and XLK +27.1%.
Which is cheaper, VGT or XLK?
XLK is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VGT and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of VGT and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, VGT against XLK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vgt-vs-xlk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.