Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FTEC vs IYW: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FTEC returned +25.0% to IYW's +23.2%; 79% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FTEC and IYW

Net assets: $22.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF, and $25.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares U.S. Technology ETF.

At a glance
+25.0%
FTEC total return, 1 year
+23.2%
IYW total return, 1 year
0.08%
FTEC expense ratio
0.37%
IYW expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FTEC costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.8 points; IYW is 1.2 times larger.

FTEC vs IYW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTECIYW
Return
Total return, 1 year+25.0%+23.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.9%, high on Oct 6, 20265.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexRussell 1000 Technology RIC 22
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.08%0.37%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$22.1bn$26.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common79%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund62.2%65.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 677 weekly returns
FTEC IYW
Return
Total return edge IYW (slight) +1,178.5% +1,228.0%
Annualized edge Tie +21.6% +22.0%
Price return edge IYW (slight) +1,031.1% +1,115.0%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 21.3% 21.6%
Max drawdown edge FTEC −34.1% −38.4%
Downside capture 100.0% 116.0%
Beta 1.00 1.19
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.94 0.94
Sortino edge Tie 1.41 1.43
Treynor 0.199 0.088
Calmar edge FTEC (slight) 0.63 0.57
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year +0.9% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 0.32
Information ratio −0.19 0.17
Tracking error 0.7% 14.2%

Each against its own benchmark: FTEC against VGT, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; IYW against IWB, May 26, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

IYW returned slightly more: +1,228.0% to +1,178.5%. FTEC and IYW swung about the same: 21.3% and 21.6%. FTEC fell less at its worst: −34.1% to −38.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FTEC vs IYW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTECIYWEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,178.5%+1,228.0%IYW (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+21.6%+22.0%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,031.1%+1,115.0%IYW (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.3%21.6%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.1%14.2%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−34.1%−38.4%FTECDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.7%146.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.0%116.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.19Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.70Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.940.94TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.411.43TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1990.088Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.630.57FTEC (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVGTIWBThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year+0.9% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.700.32Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.5% to +0.2%−4.4% to +6.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.190.17Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.7%14.2%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 677 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

79%

By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and IYW hold 79% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

79% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FTEC IYW
NVIDIA Corp 17.09% 16.81%
Apple Inc 16.21% 16.60%
Microsoft Corp 10.93% 13.07%
Broadcom Inc 4.20% 3.14%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.18% 3.04%
Micron Technology Inc 3.82% 2.73%
Intel Corp 1.65% 2.12%
Lam Research Corp 1.54% 1.49%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.17% 1.60%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.13% 2.18%
KLA Corp 1.02% 0.99%
Oracle Corp 0.90% 1.11%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FTEC
Cisco Systems Inc 1.92%
Applied Materials Inc 1.69%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.07%
Arista Networks Inc 0.84%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.82%
Accenture PLC 0.45%
Motorola Solutions Inc 0.34%
TE Connectivity PLC 0.30%
Only in IYW
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.02%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.38%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.92%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 1.55%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT 1.39%
DOORDASH CLASS A 0.32%
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CLA 0.15%
CDW 0.10%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Information Technology Tracks an index of U.S. Technology
Total return, 1 year +25.0% +23.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +24.7% (VGT) +13.1% (IWB)
Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs VGT +10.1 pts vs IWB
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.37%
Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 94.3%
Holdings 281 150
Net assets, FTEC as of Sep 30, 2026 and IYW as of Oct 27, 2026 $22.1bn $25.0bn

FTEC and IYW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-37135D313F

FTEC and IYW are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FTEC follows MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index and IYW follows Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.
  2. Cost. FTEC charges 0.08% of assets a year and IYW 0.37%, a gap of 0.29 points.
  3. Holdings in common (similar). 79% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IYW flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FTEC

FTEC tracks the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +24.7% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 281 positions, with the top ten at 62.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IYW

IYW tracks an index of U.S. Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 65.1%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or IYW?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +25.0% and IYW +23.2%.
Which is cheaper, FTEC or IYW?
FTEC is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FTEC and IYW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FTEC and 94% of IYW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FTEC against IYW, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftec-vs-iyw

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.