Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FXL vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FXL returned +29.0% to VGT's +24.7%; 27% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FXL and VGT

Net assets: $2.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund, and $154.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Information Tech ETF.

At a glance
+29.0%
FXL total return, 1 year
+24.7%
VGT total return, 1 year
0.60%
FXL expense ratio
0.09%
VGT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGT costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.3 points.

FXL vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXLVGT
Return
Total return, 1 year+29.0%+24.7%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksStrataQuant Technology IndexMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.60%0.09%
Net assets, FXL as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026$2.8bn$154.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common27%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund17.0%63.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,014 weekly returns
FXL VGT
Return
Total return edge VGT +1,055.5% +1,910.2%
Annualized edge VGT +13.4% +16.6%
Price return edge VGT +995.5% +1,587.4%
Risk
Volatility edge VGT (slight) 23.7% 21.8%
Max drawdown edge VGT −60.5% −52.4%
Downside capture 111.5% 99.9%
Beta 1.13 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VGT 0.58 0.74
Sortino edge VGT 0.85 1.10
Treynor 0.122 0.201
Calmar edge VGT 0.22 0.32
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.4% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.91 0.80
Information ratio 0.32 0.19
Tracking error 11.8% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: FXL against IWB, May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026; VGT against FTEC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VGT returned more: +1,910.2% to +1,055.5%. VGT swung slightly less: 21.8% to 23.7%. VGT fell less at its worst: −52.4% to −60.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FXL vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXLVGTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,055.5%+1,910.2%VGTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.4%+16.6%VGTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+995.5%+1,587.4%VGTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.7%21.8%VGT (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.4%14.8%VGT (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−60.5%−52.4%VGTDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture137.3%100.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture111.5%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.131.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.761.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.74VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.851.10VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1220.201Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.220.32VGTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWBFTECThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.4% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.910.80Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.8% to +7.5%−0.2% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.320.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.8%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,014 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

27%

By the books each fund has filed, FXL and VGT hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

27% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FXL VGT
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 1.36% 3.67%
Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 1.26% 1.55%
Apple Inc. 1.24% 15.91%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 1.50% 1.24%
NVIDIA Corporation 1.14% 17.58%
Micron Technology, Inc. 1.04% 4.45%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A) 1.51% 1.02%
Texas Instruments Incorporated 0.98% 0.98%
Microsoft Corporation 0.92% 11.16%
Marvell Technology, Inc. 1.10% 0.88%
Amphenol Corporation 1.10% 0.80%
Analog Devices, Inc. 1.28% 0.75%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FXL
NIQ Global Intelligence Plc 1.73%
Mobility Global Inc. 1.58%
KBR, Inc. 1.36%
Leidos Holdings, Inc. 1.36%
People Inc. 1.32%
Amdocs Limited 1.29%
Maplebear Inc. (Instacart) 1.24%
Science Applications International Corporation 1.05%
Only in VGT
Intel Corp 1.98%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.60%
Oracle Corp 0.85%
Arista Networks Inc 0.85%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.79%
Accenture PLC 0.45%
Cadence Design Systems Inc 0.38%
Synopsys Inc 0.33%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund VGT Vanguard Information Tech ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of Information technology
Total return, 1 year +29.0% +24.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +25.0% (FTEC)
Gap to its benchmark +15.9 pts vs IWB −0.3 pts vs FTEC
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 50.0% 86.8%
Holdings 110 320
Net assets, FXL as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 $2.8bn $154.5bn

FXL and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-BA2E834887

FXL and VGT are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FXL follows StrataQuant Technology Index and VGT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50.
  2. Holdings in common. 27% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FXL returned +29.0% and VGT +24.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.3 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FXL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FXL

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +29.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FXL tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 50% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 110 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.

VGT

VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXL or VGT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXL returned +29.0% and VGT +24.7%.
Which is cheaper, FXL or VGT?
VGT is cheaper, by 0.51 percentage points a year. That is about $51 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FXL and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 50% of FXL and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FXL against VGT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxl-vs-vgt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.