Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

RSPT vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, RSPT returned +43.9% to VGT's +24.7%; 38% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about RSPT and VGT

Net assets: $6.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF, and $154.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Information Tech ETF.

At a glance
+43.9%
RSPT total return, 1 year
+24.7%
VGT total return, 1 year
0.40%
RSPT expense ratio
0.09%
VGT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGT costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.2 points.

RSPT vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureRSPTVGT
Return
Total return, 1 year+43.9%+24.7%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Oct 6, 20264.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P 500 Equal Weight Information Technology IndexMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.40%0.09%
Net assets, RSPT as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026$6.2bn$154.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common38%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund16.7%63.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 17, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,040 weekly returns
RSPT VGT
Return
Total return edge VGT +1,377.6% +2,029.1%
Annualized edge VGT +14.4% +16.5%
Price return edge VGT +1,174.9% +1,682.6%
Risk
Volatility edge VGT (slight) 22.4% 21.7%
Max drawdown edge VGT −58.4% −52.4%
Downside capture 110.5% 99.9%
Beta 1.14 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VGT 0.64 0.74
Sortino edge VGT 0.93 1.09
Treynor 0.126 0.201
Calmar edge VGT 0.25 0.32
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.6% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.24 0.80
Information ratio 0.42 0.19
Tracking error 9.8% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: RSPT against IVV, Nov 17, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026; VGT against FTEC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VGT returned more: +2,029.1% to +1,377.6%. VGT swung slightly less: 21.7% to 22.4%. VGT fell less at its worst: −52.4% to −58.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: RSPT vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureRSPTVGTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,377.6%+2,029.1%VGTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.4%+16.5%VGTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,174.9%+1,682.6%VGTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.4%21.7%VGT (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%14.7%VGT (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−58.4%−52.4%VGTDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture135.4%100.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture110.5%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.141.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.821.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.640.74VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.931.09VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1260.201Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.250.32VGTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIVVFTECThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.6% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.240.80Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.5% to +6.8%−0.2% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.420.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.8%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,040 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

38%

By the books each fund has filed, RSPT and VGT hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

38% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first RSPT VGT
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.51% 1.55%
Apple Inc 1.42% 15.91%
Microsoft Corp 1.39% 11.16%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.39% 3.67%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.31% 1.60%
NVIDIA Corp 1.26% 17.58%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.55% 1.24%
Broadcom Inc 1.21% 4.11%
Micron Technology Inc 1.17% 4.45%
Intel Corp 1.14% 1.98%
Applied Materials Inc 1.09% 1.53%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 1.67% 1.02%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in RSPT
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 0.02%
SECURITIES LENDING - BNYM 0.00%
Only in VGT
Snowflake Inc 0.45%
Cloudflare Inc 0.45%
Astera Labs Inc 0.23%
Okta Inc 0.19%
SLBBH1142 0.18%
Strategy Inc 0.16%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.15%
Atlassian Corp 0.15%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF VGT Vanguard Information Tech ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of Information technology
Total return, 1 year +43.9% +24.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (IVV) +25.0% (FTEC)
Gap to its benchmark +30.2 pts vs IVV −0.3 pts vs FTEC
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 99.8% 86.8%
Holdings 77 320
Net assets, RSPT as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 $6.2bn $154.5bn

RSPT and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-41C029921E

RSPT and VGT are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. RSPT follows S&P 500 Equal Weight Information Technology Index and VGT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50.
  2. Holdings in common. 38% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 RSPT returned +43.9% and VGT +24.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 19.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

RSPT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
RSPT

RSPT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +43.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VGT

VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RSPT or VGT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSPT returned +43.9% and VGT +24.7%.
Which is cheaper, RSPT or VGT?
VGT is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RSPT and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of RSPT and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, RSPT against VGT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rspt-vs-vgt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.