Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FTEC vs RSPT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FTEC returned +25.0% to RSPT's +43.9%; 38% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FTEC and RSPT

Net assets: $22.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF, and $6.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF.

At a glance
+25.0%
FTEC total return, 1 year
+43.9%
RSPT total return, 1 year
0.08%
FTEC expense ratio
0.40%
RSPT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FTEC costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.9 points.

FTEC vs RSPT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTECRSPT
Return
Total return, 1 year+25.0%+43.9%
Drawdown
Below its high4.9%, high on Oct 6, 20264.1%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexS&P 500 Equal Weight Information Technology Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.08%0.40%
Net assets, FTEC as of Sep 30, 2026 and RSPT as of Oct 27, 2026$22.1bn$6.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common38%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund62.2%16.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 677 weekly returns
FTEC RSPT
Return
Total return edge FTEC +1,178.5% +908.7%
Annualized edge FTEC +21.6% +19.4%
Price return edge FTEC +1,031.1% +800.0%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 21.3% 21.1%
Max drawdown edge RSPT (slight) −34.1% −32.8%
Downside capture 100.0% 110.5%
Beta 1.00 1.14
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FTEC (slight) 0.94 0.85
Sortino edge FTEC (slight) 1.41 1.27
Treynor 0.199 0.126
Calmar edge FTEC (slight) 0.63 0.59
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year +2.6% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 1.24
Information ratio −0.19 0.42
Tracking error 0.7% 9.8%

Each against its own benchmark: FTEC against VGT, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; RSPT against IVV, Nov 17, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FTEC returned more: +1,178.5% to +908.7%. FTEC and RSPT swung about the same: 21.3% and 21.1%. RSPT fell slightly less at its worst: −32.8% to −34.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FTEC vs RSPT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTECRSPTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,178.5%+908.7%FTECPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+21.6%+19.4%FTECTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,031.1%+800.0%FTECPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.3%21.1%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.1%14.2%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−34.1%−32.8%RSPT (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.7%135.4%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.0%110.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.14Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.82Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.940.85FTEC (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.411.27FTEC (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1990.126Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.630.59FTEC (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVGTIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year+2.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.701.24Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.5% to +0.2%−1.5% to +6.8%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.190.42Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.7%9.8%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 677 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

38%

By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and RSPT hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

38% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FTEC RSPT
Apple Inc 16.21% 1.42%
Microsoft Corp 10.93% 1.39%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.18% 1.39%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.92% 1.31%
NVIDIA Corp 17.09% 1.26%
Broadcom Inc 4.20% 1.21%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.17% 1.55%
Micron Technology Inc 3.82% 1.17%
Intel Corp 1.65% 1.14%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.13% 1.51%
Applied Materials Inc 1.69% 1.09%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.07% 1.52%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FTEC
Snowflake Inc 0.46%
Cloudflare Inc 0.42%
AppLovin Corp 0.41%
Astera Labs Inc 0.24%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.20%
Okta Inc 0.19%
MongoDB Inc 0.16%
Zoom Communications Inc 0.15%
Only in RSPT
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 0.02%
SECURITIES LENDING - BNYM 0.00%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Information Technology Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +25.0% +43.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +24.7% (VGT) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs VGT +30.2 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.40%
Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 99.8%
Holdings 281 77
Net assets, FTEC as of Sep 30, 2026 and RSPT as of Oct 27, 2026 $22.1bn $6.2bn

FTEC and RSPT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-65A0E0E6FE

FTEC and RSPT are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FTEC follows MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index and RSPT follows S&P 500 Equal Weight Information Technology Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 38% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FTEC returned +25.0% and RSPT +43.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 18.9 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

RSPT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FTEC

FTEC tracks the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +24.7% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 281 positions, with the top ten at 62.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

RSPT

RSPT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +43.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or RSPT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +25.0% and RSPT +43.9%.
Which is cheaper, FTEC or RSPT?
FTEC is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FTEC and RSPT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FTEC and 100% of RSPT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FTEC against RSPT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftec-vs-rspt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.