Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

RSPT vs TDIV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, RSPT returned +43.9% to TDIV's +16.3%; 28% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about RSPT and TDIV

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $6.2bn for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF and $4.4bn for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund.

At a glance
+43.9%
RSPT total return, 1 year
+16.3%
TDIV total return, 1 year
0.40%
RSPT expense ratio
0.50%
TDIV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

RSPT costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 27.6 points; RSPT is 1.4 times larger.

RSPT vs TDIV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureRSPTTDIV
Return
Total return, 1 year+43.9%+16.3%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Oct 6, 20267.9%, high on Jun 2, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P 500 Equal Weight Information Technology IndexNasdaq Technology Dividend Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.40%0.50%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$6.2bn$4.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common28%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund16.7%57.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 24, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 739 weekly returns
RSPT TDIV
Return
Total return edge RSPT +1,215.4% +679.4%
Annualized edge RSPT +19.9% +15.5%
Price return edge RSPT +1,058.8% +466.5%
Risk
Volatility edge TDIV 20.6% 17.9%
Max drawdown edge TDIV (slight) −32.8% −30.5%
Downside capture 110.5% 105.8%
Beta 1.14 1.03
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge RSPT 0.90 0.80
Sortino edge RSPT 1.34 1.18
Treynor 0.126 0.138
Calmar edge RSPT 0.61 0.51
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.6% a year +0.7% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.24 0.37
Information ratio 0.42 0.16
Tracking error 9.8% 7.4%

Each against its own benchmark: RSPT against IVV, Nov 17, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026; TDIV against VOO, Aug 24, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

RSPT returned more: +1,215.4% to +679.4%. TDIV swung less: 17.9% to 20.6%. TDIV fell slightly less at its worst: −30.5% to −32.8%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: RSPT vs TDIV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureRSPTTDIVEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,215.4%+679.4%RSPTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+19.9%+15.5%RSPTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,058.8%+466.5%RSPTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.6%17.9%TDIVSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.8%12.1%TDIVLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−32.8%−30.5%TDIV (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture135.4%112.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture110.5%105.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.141.03Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.820.83Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.900.80RSPTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.341.18RSPTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1260.138Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.610.51RSPTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIVVVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.6% a year+0.7% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.240.37Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.5% to +6.8%−3.2% to +4.6%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.420.16Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.8%7.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 739 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

28%

By the books each fund has filed, RSPT and TDIV hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

28% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first RSPT TDIV
Texas Instruments Inc 1.52% 9.37%
Analog Devices Inc 1.50% 3.55%
NXP Semiconductors NV 1.47% 1.72%
Microchip Technology Inc 1.42% 1.61%
Microsoft Corp 1.39% 8.29%
TE Connectivity PLC 1.42% 1.38%
Motorola Solutions Inc 1.36% 1.50%
Intuit Inc 1.35% 1.79%
QUALCOMM Inc 1.35% 4.27%
International Business Machines Corp 1.35% 8.47%
HP Inc 1.34% 1.79%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.31% 1.99%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in RSPT
PTC Inc 1.95%
Everpure Inc 1.84%
Accenture PLC 1.74%
Gartner Inc 1.68%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 1.67%
Datadog Inc 1.61%
Synopsys Inc 1.56%
Cadence Design Systems Inc 1.56%
Only in TDIV
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (ADR) 4.16%
Thomson Reuters Corporation 2.78%
Vistance Networks Inc. 2.06%
TELUS Corporation 1.76%
Verizon Communications Inc. 1.74%
Comcast Corporation (Class A) 1.62%
T-Mobile US, Inc. 1.61%
AT&T Inc. 1.60%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +43.9% +16.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (IVV) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark +30.2 pts vs IVV +2.6 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.50%
Already in the S&P 500 99.8% 78.8%
Holdings 77 87
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $6.2bn $4.4bn

RSPT and TDIV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-49ECBFECBF

RSPT and TDIV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. RSPT follows S&P 500 Equal Weight Information Technology Index and TDIV follows Nasdaq Technology Dividend Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 28% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 RSPT returned +43.9% and TDIV +16.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 27.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

RSPT and TDIV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
RSPT

RSPT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +43.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

TDIV

TDIV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 79% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 87 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 7.9% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RSPT or TDIV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSPT returned +43.9% and TDIV +16.3%.
Which is cheaper, RSPT or TDIV?
RSPT is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RSPT and TDIV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of RSPT and 79% of TDIV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, RSPT against TDIV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rspt-vs-tdiv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.