Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FXL vs TDIV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FXL returned +29.0% to TDIV's +16.3%; 15% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FXL and TDIV

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $2.8bn for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund and $4.4bn for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund.

At a glance
+29.0%
FXL total return, 1 year
+16.3%
TDIV total return, 1 year
0.60%
FXL expense ratio
0.50%
TDIV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

TDIV costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.7 points; TDIV is 1.6 times larger.

FXL vs TDIV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXLTDIV
Return
Total return, 1 year+29.0%+16.3%
Drawdown
Below its high7.9%, high on Jun 2, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksStrataQuant Technology IndexNasdaq Technology Dividend Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.60%0.50%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$2.8bn$4.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common15%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund17.0%57.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 24, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 739 weekly returns
FXL TDIV
Return
Total return edge FXL +960.0% +679.4%
Annualized edge FXL +18.1% +15.5%
Price return edge FXL +905.8% +466.5%
Risk
Volatility edge TDIV 21.9% 17.9%
Max drawdown edge TDIV −38.0% −30.5%
Downside capture 111.5% 105.8%
Beta 1.13 1.03
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.79 0.80
Sortino edge Tie 1.18 1.18
Treynor 0.122 0.138
Calmar edge TDIV (slight) 0.48 0.51
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.4% a year +0.7% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.91 0.37
Information ratio 0.32 0.16
Tracking error 11.8% 7.4%

Each against its own benchmark: FXL against IWB, May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026; TDIV against VOO, Aug 24, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FXL returned more: +960.0% to +679.4%. TDIV swung less: 17.9% to 21.9%. TDIV fell less at its worst: −30.5% to −38.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FXL vs TDIV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXLTDIVEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+960.0%+679.4%FXLPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.1%+15.5%FXLTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+905.8%+466.5%FXLPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.9%17.9%TDIVSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.6%12.1%TDIVLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−38.0%−30.5%TDIVDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture137.3%112.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture111.5%105.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.131.03Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.760.83Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.790.80TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.181.18TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1220.138Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.480.51TDIV (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWBVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.4% a year+0.7% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.910.37Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.8% to +7.5%−3.2% to +4.6%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.320.16Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.8%7.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 739 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

15%

By the books each fund has filed, FXL and TDIV hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

15% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FXL TDIV
Analog Devices, Inc. 1.28% 3.55%
Dell Technologies Inc. (Class C) 1.39% 1.23%
Amphenol Corporation 1.10% 1.66%
Intuit Inc. 1.06% 1.79%
Texas Instruments Incorporated 0.98% 9.37%
Microsoft Corporation 0.92% 8.29%
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation 1.71% 0.88%
NetApp, Inc. 1.61% 0.75%
Salesforce, Inc. 0.62% 1.97%
Microchip Technology Incorporated 0.61% 1.61%
Broadcom Inc. 0.58% 7.32%
Roper Technologies, Inc. 1.48% 0.54%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FXL
EPAM Systems, Inc. 1.83%
Atlassian Corporation (Class A) 1.82%
Rubrik, Inc. (Class A) 1.76%
NIQ Global Intelligence Plc 1.73%
RingCentral, Inc. (Class A) 1.70%
PTC Inc. 1.65%
SentinelOne, Inc. (Class A) 1.61%
Zoom Communications, Inc. (Class A) 1.60%
Only in TDIV
Oracle Corporation 6.93%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (ADR) 4.16%
Thomson Reuters Corporation 2.78%
Vistance Networks Inc. 2.06%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 1.99%
HP Inc. 1.79%
TELUS Corporation 1.76%
Verizon Communications Inc. 1.74%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +29.0% +16.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark +15.9 pts vs IWB +2.6 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.50%
Already in the S&P 500 50.0% 78.8%
Holdings 110 87
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $2.8bn $4.4bn

FXL and TDIV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-051300168E

FXL and TDIV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FXL follows StrataQuant Technology Index and TDIV follows Nasdaq Technology Dividend Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 15% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FXL returned +29.0% and TDIV +16.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 12.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FXL and TDIV flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FXL

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +29.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FXL tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 50% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 110 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.

TDIV

TDIV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 79% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 87 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 7.9% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXL or TDIV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXL returned +29.0% and TDIV +16.3%.
Which is cheaper, FXL or TDIV?
TDIV is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FXL and TDIV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 50% of FXL and 79% of TDIV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FXL against TDIV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxl-vs-tdiv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.