Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

TDIV vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, TDIV returned +16.3% to XLK's +27.1%; 29% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about TDIV and XLK

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $4.4bn for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund and $125.0bn for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+16.3%
TDIV total return, 1 year
+27.1%
XLK total return, 1 year
0.50%
TDIV expense ratio
0.08%
XLK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLK costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.8 points; XLK is far larger, $125.0bn against $4.4bn.

TDIV vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureTDIVXLK
Return
Total return, 1 year+16.3%+27.1%
Drawdown
Below its high7.9%, high on Jun 2, 20265.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNasdaq Technology Dividend IndexTechnology Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.50%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$4.4bn$125.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common29%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.2%64.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 24, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 739 weekly returns
TDIV XLK
Return
Total return edge XLK +679.4% +1,337.7%
Annualized edge XLK +15.5% +20.6%
Price return edge XLK +466.5% +1,098.8%
Risk
Volatility edge TDIV 17.9% 20.4%
Max drawdown edge TDIV (slight) −30.5% −32.6%
Downside capture 105.8% 113.0%
Beta 1.03 1.15
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge XLK 0.80 0.94
Sortino edge XLK 1.18 1.42
Treynor 0.138 0.094
Calmar edge XLK 0.51 0.63
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.7% a year +1.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.37 0.67
Information ratio 0.16 0.22
Tracking error 7.4% 12.6%

Each against its own benchmark: TDIV against VOO, Aug 24, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026; XLK against SPY, Dec 31, 1998 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

XLK returned more: +1,337.7% to +679.4%. TDIV swung less: 17.9% to 20.4%. TDIV fell slightly less at its worst: −30.5% to −32.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: TDIV vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureTDIVXLKEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+679.4%+1,337.7%XLKPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.5%+20.6%XLKTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+466.5%+1,098.8%XLKPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.9%20.4%TDIVSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.1%13.4%TDIVLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−30.5%−32.6%TDIV (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture112.8%138.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture105.8%113.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.031.15Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.830.73Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.800.94XLKReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.181.42XLKReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1380.094Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.510.63XLKAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.7% a year+1.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.370.67Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.2% to +4.6%−3.0% to +6.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.160.22Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.4%12.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 739 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

29%

By the books each fund has filed, TDIV and XLK hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

29% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first TDIV XLK
Microsoft Corporation 8.29% 11.38%
Broadcom Inc. 7.32% 4.70%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 1.99% 2.56%
Texas Instruments Incorporated 9.37% 1.65%
International Business Machines Corporation 8.47% 1.38%
Oracle Corporation 6.93% 1.32%
Analog Devices, Inc. 3.55% 1.21%
Salesforce, Inc. 1.97% 1.15%
QUALCOMM Incorporated 4.27% 1.15%
Amphenol Corporation 1.66% 1.13%
Dell Technologies Inc. (Class C) 1.23% 0.89%
Corning Incorporated 1.22% 0.58%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in TDIV
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (ADR) 4.16%
Thomson Reuters Corporation 2.78%
Vistance Networks Inc. 2.06%
TELUS Corporation 1.76%
Verizon Communications Inc. 1.74%
Comcast Corporation (Class A) 1.62%
T-Mobile US, Inc. 1.61%
AT&T Inc. 1.60%
Only in XLK
NVIDIA CORP 15.22%
APPLE INC 14.62%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.78%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.02%
INTEL CORP 2.72%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC A 2.67%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC 1.91%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 1.84%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of Technology
Total return, 1 year +16.3% +27.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark +2.6 pts vs VOO +13.5 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 78.8% 99.9%
Holdings 87 76
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $4.4bn $125.0bn

TDIV and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-48EC504EF9

TDIV and XLK are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. TDIV follows Nasdaq Technology Dividend Index and XLK follows Technology Select Sector Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 29% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 TDIV returned +16.3% and XLK +27.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

TDIV and XLK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
TDIV

TDIV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 79% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 87 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 7.9% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLK

XLK tracks an index of Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, TDIV or XLK?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TDIV returned +16.3% and XLK +27.1%.
Which is cheaper, TDIV or XLK?
XLK is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do TDIV and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 79% of TDIV and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, TDIV against XLK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tdiv-vs-xlk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.