Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FXL vs IYW: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FXL returned +29.0% to IYW's +23.2%; 31% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FXL and IYW

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $2.8bn for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund and $25.0bn for iShares U.S. Technology ETF.

At a glance
+29.0%
FXL total return, 1 year
+23.2%
IYW total return, 1 year
0.60%
FXL expense ratio
0.37%
IYW expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IYW costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.8 points; IYW is 8.9 times larger.

FXL vs IYW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXLIYW
Return
Total return, 1 year+29.0%+23.2%
Drawdown
Below its high5.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksStrataQuant Technology IndexRussell 1000 Technology RIC 22
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.60%0.37%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$2.8bn$25.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common31%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund17.0%65.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,014 weekly returns · each against IWB
FXL IYW
Return
Total return edge IYW +1,055.5% +1,855.4%
Annualized edge IYW +13.4% +16.5%
Price return edge IYW +995.5% +1,616.8%
Risk
Volatility edge IYW (slight) 23.7% 22.1%
Max drawdown edge IYW −60.5% −52.3%
Downside capture 111.5% 107.5%
Beta 1.13 1.08
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IYW 0.58 0.73
Sortino edge IYW 0.85 1.09
Treynor 0.122 0.150
Calmar edge IYW 0.22 0.31
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.4% a year +5.3% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.91 2.32
Information ratio 0.32 0.60
Tracking error 11.8% 10.1%
Reading

IYW returned more: +1,855.4% to +1,055.5%. IYW swung slightly less: 22.1% to 23.7%. IYW fell less at its worst: −52.3% to −60.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FXL vs IYW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXLIYWIWBEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,055.5%+1,855.4%IYWPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.4%+16.5%IYWTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+995.5%+1,616.8%IYWPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.7%22.1%IYW (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.4%14.9%IYW (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−60.5%−52.3%IYWDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture137.3%135.0%100.0%TieShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture111.5%107.5%100.0%IYW (slight)Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.131.081.00IYW lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.760.801.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.73IYWReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.851.09IYWReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1220.1500.101IYWReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.220.31IYWAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWBIWBIWBThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.4% a year+5.3% a year0.0%IYW significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.912.32Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.8% to +7.5%+0.8% to +9.7%FXL's includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.320.60IYWReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.8%10.1%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,014 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

31%

By the books each fund has filed, FXL and IYW hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

31% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FXL IYW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 1.50% 1.60%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 1.36% 3.04%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A) 1.51% 1.33%
Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 1.26% 2.18%
Apple Inc. 1.24% 16.60%
NVIDIA Corporation 1.14% 16.81%
Marvell Technology, Inc. 1.10% 1.05%
Micron Technology, Inc. 1.04% 2.73%
Analog Devices, Inc. 1.28% 1.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 1.02% 3.02%
Texas Instruments Incorporated 0.98% 1.39%
Amphenol Corporation 1.10% 0.95%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FXL
Only in IYW
INTEL CORPORATION 2.12%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.92%
ORACLE 1.11%
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS 0.47%
SYNOPSYS 0.44%
APPLOVIN CLASS A 0.31%
AUTODESK 0.25%
STRATEGY INC CLASS A 0.25%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of U.S. Technology
Total return, 1 year +29.0% +23.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +13.1% (IWB)
Gap to its benchmark +15.9 pts vs IWB +10.1 pts vs IWB
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.37%
Already in the S&P 500 50.0% 94.3%
Holdings 110 150
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $2.8bn $25.0bn

FXL and IYW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-30B0C2087F

FXL and IYW are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FXL follows StrataQuant Technology Index and IYW follows Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.
  2. Holdings in common. 31% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FXL returned +29.0% and IYW +23.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 5.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FXL and IYW flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FXL

FXL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +29.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 50% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 110 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.

IYW

IYW tracks an index of U.S. Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 65.1%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXL or IYW?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXL returned +29.0% and IYW +23.2%.
Which is cheaper, FXL or IYW?
IYW is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FXL and IYW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 50% of FXL and 94% of IYW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FXL against IYW, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxl-vs-iyw

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.