Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FXL vs XNTK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FXL returned +29.0% to XNTK's +24.9%; 19% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FXL and XNTK

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $2.8bn for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund and $1.9bn for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF.

At a glance
+29.0%
FXL total return, 1 year
+24.9%
XNTK total return, 1 year
0.60%
FXL expense ratio
0.35%
XNTK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XNTK costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.1 points; FXL is 1.5 times larger.

FXL vs XNTK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXLXNTK
Return
Total return, 1 year+29.0%+24.9%
Drawdown
Below its high6.9%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksStrataQuant Technology IndexNYSE Technology Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.60%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$2.8bn$1.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common19%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund17.0%48.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,014 weekly returns
FXL XNTK
Return
Total return edge XNTK +1,055.5% +1,607.5%
Annualized edge XNTK +13.4% +15.7%
Price return edge XNTK (slight) +995.5% +1,046.7%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 23.7% 23.7%
Max drawdown edge XNTK (slight) −60.5% −56.5%
Downside capture 111.5% 117.2%
Beta 1.13 1.22
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge XNTK 0.58 0.67
Sortino edge XNTK 0.85 0.98
Treynor 0.122 0.095
Calmar edge XNTK 0.22 0.28
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.4% a year +1.5% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.91 0.54
Information ratio 0.32 0.23
Tracking error 11.8% 14.3%

Each against its own benchmark: FXL against IWB, May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026; XNTK against IVV, Jan 12, 2001 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

XNTK returned more: +1,607.5% to +1,055.5%. FXL and XNTK swung about the same: 23.7% and 23.7%. XNTK fell slightly less at its worst: −56.5% to −60.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FXL vs XNTK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXLXNTKEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,055.5%+1,607.5%XNTKPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.4%+15.7%XNTKTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+995.5%+1,046.7%XNTK (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.7%23.7%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.4%16.1%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−60.5%−56.5%XNTK (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture137.3%151.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture111.5%117.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.131.22Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.760.70Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.67XNTKReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.850.98XNTKReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1220.095Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.220.28XNTKAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWBIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.4% a year+1.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.910.54Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.8% to +7.5%−3.9% to +6.8%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.320.23Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.8%14.3%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,014 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

19%

By the books each fund has filed, FXL and XNTK hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

19% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FXL XNTK
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A) 1.51% 4.69%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 1.36% 5.87%
Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 1.26% 2.39%
Apple Inc. 1.24% 2.75%
NVIDIA Corporation 1.14% 2.75%
Amphenol Corporation 1.10% 2.67%
Marvell Technology, Inc. 1.10% 6.37%
Intuit Inc. 1.06% 1.08%
Micron Technology, Inc. 1.04% 8.50%
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 1.02% 2.13%
Texas Instruments Incorporated 0.98% 3.80%
Adobe Incorporated 0.92% 1.54%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FXL
EPAM Systems, Inc. 1.83%
Atlassian Corporation (Class A) 1.82%
Rubrik, Inc. (Class A) 1.76%
NIQ Global Intelligence Plc 1.73%
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation 1.71%
RingCentral, Inc. (Class A) 1.70%
PTC Inc. 1.65%
NetApp, Inc. 1.61%
Only in XNTK
INTEL CORP 5.47%
ASML HOLDING NV NY REG SHS 3.34%
ARISTA NETWORKS INC 3.31%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR SP ADR 3.30%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.16%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.47%
SHOPIFY INC CLASS A 2.23%
TESLA INC 1.96%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +29.0% +24.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +15.9 pts vs IWB +11.2 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 50.0% 90.2%
Holdings 110 35
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $2.8bn $1.9bn

FXL and XNTK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-0CE1A95C38

FXL and XNTK are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FXL follows StrataQuant Technology Index and XNTK follows NYSE Technology Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 19% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FXL returned +29.0% and XNTK +24.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FXL and XNTK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FXL

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +29.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FXL tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 50% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 110 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.

XNTK

XNTK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 35 positions, with the top ten at 48.1%. It sat 6.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXL or XNTK?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXL returned +29.0% and XNTK +24.9%.
Which is cheaper, FXL or XNTK?
XNTK is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. That is about $25 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FXL and XNTK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 50% of FXL and 90% of XNTK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FXL against XNTK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxl-vs-xntk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.