Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FXL vs QTEC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FXL returned +29.0% to QTEC's +29.4%; 29% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FXL and QTEC

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $2.8bn for First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund and $4.6bn for First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund.

At a glance
+29.0%
FXL total return, 1 year
+29.4%
QTEC total return, 1 year
0.60%
FXL expense ratio
0.55%
QTEC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QTEC costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; QTEC is 1.6 times larger.

FXL vs QTEC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXLQTEC
Return
Total return, 1 year+29.0%+29.4%
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksStrataQuant Technology IndexNasdaq-100 Technology Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.60%0.55%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$2.8bn$4.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common29%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund17.0%25.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,014 weekly returns
FXL QTEC
Return
Total return edge QTEC +1,055.5% +1,463.3%
Annualized edge QTEC +13.4% +15.1%
Price return edge QTEC +995.5% +1,320.4%
Risk
Volatility edge FXL (slight) 23.7% 24.6%
Max drawdown edge QTEC (slight) −60.5% −57.8%
Downside capture 111.5% 115.4%
Beta 1.13 1.19
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QTEC (slight) 0.58 0.64
Sortino edge QTEC (slight) 0.85 0.93
Treynor 0.122 0.128
Calmar edge QTEC 0.22 0.26
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.4% a year +2.9% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.91 1.07
Information ratio 0.32 0.39
Tracking error 11.8% 12.6%

Each against its own benchmark: FXL against IWB, May 18, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026; QTEC against IVV, May 12, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QTEC returned more: +1,463.3% to +1,055.5%. FXL swung slightly less: 23.7% to 24.6%. QTEC fell slightly less at its worst: −57.8% to −60.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FXL vs QTEC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFXLQTECEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,055.5%+1,463.3%QTECPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.4%+15.1%QTECTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+995.5%+1,320.4%QTECPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility23.7%24.6%FXL (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.4%16.8%FXL (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−60.5%−57.8%QTEC (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture137.3%151.5%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture111.5%115.4%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.131.19Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.760.75Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.64QTEC (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.850.93QTEC (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1220.128Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.220.26QTECAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWBIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.4% a year+2.9% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.911.07Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.8% to +7.5%−2.4% to +8.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.320.39Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.8%12.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,014 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

29%

By the books each fund has filed, FXL and QTEC hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

29% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FXL QTEC
Fortinet, Inc. 1.54% 2.37%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A) 1.51% 2.54%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 1.50% 2.30%
Roper Technologies, Inc. 1.48% 2.24%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 1.36% 2.61%
Analog Devices, Inc. 1.28% 2.58%
Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 1.26% 2.34%
Apple Inc. 1.24% 2.40%
Datadog, Inc. (Class A) 1.22% 2.60%
NVIDIA Corporation 1.14% 2.16%
Marvell Technology, Inc. 1.10% 2.52%
Intuit Inc. 1.06% 2.00%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FXL
EPAM Systems, Inc. 1.83%
Atlassian Corporation (Class A) 1.82%
Rubrik, Inc. (Class A) 1.76%
NIQ Global Intelligence Plc 1.73%
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation 1.71%
RingCentral, Inc. (Class A) 1.70%
PTC Inc. 1.65%
NetApp, Inc. 1.61%
Only in QTEC
NXP Semiconductors N.V. 2.47%
Shopify Inc. (Class A) 2.47%
Thomson Reuters Corporation 2.38%
Synopsys, Inc. 2.37%
Strategy Incorporated (Class A) 2.33%
Intel Corporation 2.30%
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. 2.22%
ASML Holding N.V. (New York Registry Shares) 2.11%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FXL First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +29.0% +29.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +15.9 pts vs IWB +15.7 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.55%
Already in the S&P 500 50.0% 80.9%
Holdings 110 47
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $2.8bn $4.6bn

FXL and QTEC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-9B7FB624FB

FXL and QTEC are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FXL follows StrataQuant Technology Index and QTEC follows Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 29% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FXL returned +29.0% and QTEC +29.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FXL and QTEC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FXL

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +29.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FXL tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 50% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 110 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.

QTEC

QTEC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +29.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 25.2%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FXL or QTEC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FXL returned +29.0% and QTEC +29.4%.
Which is cheaper, FXL or QTEC?
QTEC is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FXL and QTEC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 50% of FXL and 81% of QTEC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FXL against QTEC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fxl-vs-qtec

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.