Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

RSPT vs XNTK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, RSPT returned +43.9% to XNTK's +24.9%; 30% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about RSPT and XNTK

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $6.2bn for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF and $1.9bn for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF.

At a glance
+43.9%
RSPT total return, 1 year
+24.9%
XNTK total return, 1 year
0.40%
RSPT expense ratio
0.35%
XNTK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XNTK costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.0 points; RSPT is 3.3 times larger.

RSPT vs XNTK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureRSPTXNTK
Return
Total return, 1 year+43.9%+24.9%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Oct 6, 20266.9%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P 500 Equal Weight Information Technology IndexNYSE Technology Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.40%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$6.2bn$1.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common30%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund16.7%48.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 17, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,040 weekly returns · each against IVV
RSPT XNTK
Return
Total return edge XNTK +1,377.6% +1,702.7%
Annualized edge XNTK (slight) +14.4% +15.6%
Price return edge RSPT (slight) +1,174.9% +1,110.6%
Risk
Volatility edge RSPT (slight) 22.4% 23.5%
Max drawdown edge XNTK (slight) −58.4% −56.5%
Downside capture 110.5% 112.4%
Beta 1.14 1.16
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge XNTK (slight) 0.64 0.66
Sortino edge XNTK (slight) 0.93 0.98
Treynor 0.126 0.135
Calmar edge XNTK 0.25 0.28
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.6% a year +3.7% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.24 1.46
Information ratio 0.42 0.46
Tracking error 9.8% 11.6%
Reading

XNTK returned more: +1,702.7% to +1,377.6%. RSPT swung slightly less: 22.4% to 23.5%. XNTK fell slightly less at its worst: −56.5% to −58.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: RSPT vs XNTK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureRSPTXNTKIVVEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,377.6%+1,702.7%XNTKPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.4%+15.6%XNTK (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,174.9%+1,110.6%RSPT (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.4%23.5%RSPT (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%16.0%RSPT (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−58.4%−56.5%XNTK (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture135.4%145.0%100.0%XNTK (slight)Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture110.5%112.4%100.0%TieShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.141.161.00TieHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.820.771.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.640.66XNTK (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.930.98XNTK (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1260.1350.103XNTK (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.250.28XNTKAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIVVIVVIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.6% a year+3.7% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.241.46Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.5% to +6.8%−1.3% to +8.6%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.420.46XNTK (slight)Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.8%11.6%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,040 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

30%

By the books each fund has filed, RSPT and XNTK hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

30% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first RSPT XNTK
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 1.67% 4.69%
ServiceNow Inc 1.52% 1.98%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.52% 3.80%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.51% 2.39%
Apple Inc 1.42% 2.75%
Microsoft Corp 1.39% 2.45%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.39% 5.87%
QUALCOMM Inc 1.35% 2.28%
International Business Machines Corp 1.35% 1.79%
Marvell Technology Inc 1.34% 6.37%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.31% 3.16%
Salesforce Inc 1.27% 2.03%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in RSPT
PTC Inc 1.95%
Everpure Inc 1.84%
Accenture PLC 1.74%
Gartner Inc 1.68%
Datadog Inc 1.61%
NetApp Inc 1.59%
Synopsys Inc 1.56%
Cadence Design Systems Inc 1.56%
Only in XNTK
ASML HOLDING NV NY REG SHS 3.34%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR SP ADR 3.30%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.47%
ALPHABET INC CL A 2.29%
SHOPIFY INC CLASS A 2.23%
META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 2.13%
TESLA INC 1.96%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.71%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +43.9% +24.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (IVV) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +30.2 pts vs IVV +11.2 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 99.8% 90.2%
Holdings 77 35
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $6.2bn $1.9bn

RSPT and XNTK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-8309B4A71A

RSPT and XNTK are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. RSPT follows S&P 500 Equal Weight Information Technology Index and XNTK follows NYSE Technology Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 30% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 RSPT returned +43.9% and XNTK +24.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 19.0 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

RSPT and XNTK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
RSPT

RSPT tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +43.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 16.7%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XNTK

XNTK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 35 positions, with the top ten at 48.1%. It sat 6.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RSPT or XNTK?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSPT returned +43.9% and XNTK +24.9%.
Which is cheaper, RSPT or XNTK?
XNTK is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RSPT and XNTK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of RSPT and 90% of XNTK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, RSPT against XNTK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rspt-vs-xntk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.