Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ITOT vs IYW: how they differ

ITOT and IYW hold 41% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and iShares U.S. Technology ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ITOT and IYW hold 41% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ITOT and IYW both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingITOTIYW
NVIDIA7.32%14.10%
APPLE6.63%13.20%
MICROSOFT5.06%10.75%
ALPHABET CLASS A2.70%5.48%
BROADCOM INC2.37%4.07%
ALPHABET CLASS C2.16%4.44%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A1.96%4.17%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY1.52%3.35%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES1.14%3.08%
INTEL CORPORATION0.68%2.27%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A0.53%1.83%
LAM RESEARCH0.52%1.85%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ITOTOnly in IYW
AMAZON.COM INC 3.41%IREN 0.07%
TESLA INC 1.41%AMDOCS 0.03%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.31%FIGURE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CLASS 0.03%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.29%GLOBALFOUNDRIES 0.03%
ELI LILLY 1.23%FIGMA CLASS A 0.02%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.94%PEGASYSTEMS 0.02%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.88%UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP 0.02%
VISA CLASS A 0.84%CASH COLLATERAL USD WFFUT 0.01%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

ITOT and IYW on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore S&P Total U.S. Stock MarketU.S. Technology
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+34.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts+17.4 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.37%
Already in the S&P 50088.3%95.5%
Holdings1167151

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1167 positions, with the top ten at 34.6%.

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 151 positions, with the top ten at 64.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or IYW?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +17.2% and IYW returned +34.9%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ITOT or IYW?
ITOT charges 0.03% a year and IYW charges 0.37%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ITOT and IYW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of ITOT and 96% of IYW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 41% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ITOT against IYW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ITOT against IYW, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/itot-vs-iyw Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources