Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IYW vs XLF: how they differ
IYW and XLF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Technology ETF and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IYW and XLF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IYW | Only in XLF |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 14.10% | JPMORGAN CHASE + CO 11.81% |
| APPLE 13.20% | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B 11.59% |
| MICROSOFT 10.75% | VISA INC CLASS A SHARES 7.60% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A 5.48% | MASTERCARD INC A 5.69% |
| ALPHABET CLASS C 4.44% | BANK OF AMERICA CORP 5.09% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A 4.17% | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 3.75% |
| BROADCOM INC 4.07% | WELLS FARGO + CO 3.41% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.35% | MORGAN STANLEY 3.18% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | XLF State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | U.S. Technology | Financials |
| Total return, 1 year | +34.9% | +7.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +17.4 pts | −9.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.5% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 151 | 79 |
IYW in plain words
IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 151 positions, with the top ten at 64.9%.
XLF in plain words
XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IYW or XLF?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYW returned +34.9% and XLF returned +7.6%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IYW or XLF?
- IYW charges 0.37% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so XLF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IYW and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 96% of IYW and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYW against XLF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iyw-vs-xlf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources