Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs XLF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to XLF's +7.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and XLF

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $139.4bn for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and $51.6bn for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
AGG total return, 1 year
+7.6%
XLF total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
0.08%
XLF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.0 points; AGG is 2.7 times larger.

AGG vs XLF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGXLF
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+7.6%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 4, 20203.8%, high on Sep 3, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond IndexFinancial Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$139.4bn$51.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund57.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AGG and XLF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AGG XLF
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AGG
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 3.02%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE (OLD) 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
Only in XLF
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B 12.84%
JPMORGAN CHASE + CO 11.33%
VISA INC CLASS A SHARES 8.69%
MASTERCARD INC A 6.26%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 4.18%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 3.37%
WELLS FARGO + CO 3.17%
MORGAN STANLEY 2.83%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks an index of Financials
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +7.6%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.3% (SCHZ) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SCHZ not measured
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.08%
Holdings 13469 77
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $139.4bn $51.6bn

AGG and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AGG and XLF flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLF

XLF tracks an index of Financials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 57.4%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or XLF?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and XLF +7.6%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or XLF?
AGG is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against XLF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-xlf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.