Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWM vs IYW: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWM returned +14.1% to IYW's +23.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWM and IYW

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $75.5bn for iShares Russell 2000 ETF and $25.0bn for iShares U.S. Technology ETF.

At a glance
+14.1%
IWM total return, 1 year
+23.2%
IYW total return, 1 year
0.19%
IWM expense ratio
0.37%
IYW expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWM costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.1 points; IWM is 3.0 times larger.

IWM vs IYW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWMIYW
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.1%+23.2%
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Aug 14, 20265.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 IndexRussell 1000 Technology RIC 22
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.19%0.37%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$75.5bn$25.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.3%65.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWM and IYW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWM IYW
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWM
JFROG 0.37%
GLAUKOS 0.35%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.35%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.34%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.33%
UMB FINANCIAL 0.33%
SM ENERGY 0.32%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.31%
Only in IYW
NVIDIA 16.81%
APPLE 16.60%
MICROSOFT 13.07%
BROADCOM INC 3.14%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.04%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.02%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.73%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.38%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Tracks an index of U.S. Technology
Total return, 1 year +14.1% +23.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (VTWO) +13.1% (IWB)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VTWO +10.1 pts vs IWB
Expense ratio 0.19% 0.37%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 94.3%
Holdings 1977 150
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $75.5bn $25.0bn

IWM and IYW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWM and IYW flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IYW

IYW tracks an index of U.S. Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 65.1%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWM or IYW?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +14.1% and IYW +23.2%.
Which is cheaper, IWM or IYW?
IWM is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWM and IYW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWM and 94% of IYW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWM against IYW, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-iyw

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.