Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IYW vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IYW returned +23.2% to ONEQ's +12.7%; 54% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IYW and ONEQ
Net assets: $25.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares U.S. Technology ETF, and $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
ONEQ costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.5 points; IYW is 2.4 times larger.
| Measure | IYW | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +23.2% | +12.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 3.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22 | Nasdaq Composite Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.21% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $26.5bn | $10.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 54% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 65.1% | 56.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IYW and ONEQ hold 54% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
54% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IYW and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IYW and ONEQ do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IYW follows Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22 and ONEQ follows Nasdaq Composite Index.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IYW returned +23.2% and ONEQ +12.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.5 points.
- Number of holdings. IYW holds 150 positions and ONEQ holds 1026.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IYW
IYW tracks an index of U.S. Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 65.1%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
ONEQ
ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,026 positions, with the top ten at 56.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IYW or ONEQ?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYW returned +23.2% and ONEQ +12.7%.
- Which is cheaper, IYW or ONEQ?
- ONEQ is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IYW against ONEQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iyw-vs-oneq
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IYW against ONEQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iyw-vs-oneq
[IYW against ONEQ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iyw-vs-oneq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.