Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IYW vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IYW returned +23.2% to SCHG's +6.8%; 52% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IYW and SCHG

Net assets: $25.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares U.S. Technology ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+23.2%
IYW total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
0.37%
IYW expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHG costs 0.33 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.4 points.

IYW vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIYWSCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.2%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high5.5%, high on Oct 6, 20263.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 Technology RIC 22Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.37%0.04%
Net assets, IYW as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026$25.0bn$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common52%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund65.1%51.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 879 weekly returns
IYW SCHG
Return
Total return edge IYW +1,908.6% +1,156.7%
Annualized edge IYW +19.4% +16.2%
Price return edge IYW +1,683.9% +988.8%
Risk
Volatility edge SCHG 21.1% 18.5%
Max drawdown edge SCHG −38.4% −34.2%
Downside capture 116.0% 108.1%
Beta 1.19 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IYW (slight) 0.88 0.82
Sortino edge IYW (slight) 1.32 1.22
Treynor 0.088 0.138
Calmar edge IYW (slight) 0.51 0.47
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.9% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.32 0.65
Information ratio 0.17 0.40
Tracking error 14.2% 5.5%

Each against its own benchmark: IYW against IWB, May 26, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHG against IVV, Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

IYW returned more: +1,908.6% to +1,156.7%. SCHG swung less: 18.5% to 21.1%. SCHG fell less at its worst: −34.2% to −38.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IYW vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIYWSCHGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,908.6%+1,156.7%IYWPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+19.4%+16.2%IYWTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,683.9%+988.8%IYWPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.1%18.5%SCHGSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.9%12.5%SCHGLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−38.4%−34.2%SCHGDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture146.1%121.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture116.0%108.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.191.10Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.700.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.880.82IYW (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.321.22IYW (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0880.138Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.510.47IYW (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWBIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.9% a year+0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.320.65Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−4.4% to +6.1%−1.7% to +3.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.170.40Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error14.2%5.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 879 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

52%

By the books each fund has filed, IYW and SCHG hold 52% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

52% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IYW SCHG
NVIDIA 16.81% 10.67%
APPLE 16.60% 9.29%
MICROSOFT 13.07% 7.52%
BROADCOM INC 3.14% 3.50%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.02% 2.51%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.38% 3.97%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.04% 2.37%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.92% 3.16%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 2.18% 1.65%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 1.60% 1.19%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 1.33% 0.91%
KLA 0.99% 0.88%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IYW
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.73%
INTEL CORPORATION 2.12%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 1.55%
LAM RESEARCH 1.49%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT 1.39%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CO 1.16%
ORACLE 1.11%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY 1.05%
Only in SCHG
Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.93%
Visa Inc 2.43%
Tesla Inc 2.37%
Mastercard Inc 1.83%
Costco Wholesale Corp 1.61%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.36%
General Electric Co 1.35%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of U.S. Technology Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +23.2% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +10.1 pts vs IWB −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.37% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 94.3% 94.7%
Holdings 150 192
Net assets, IYW as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 $25.0bn $63.0bn

IYW and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-FDF2E3373B

IYW and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IYW follows Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22 and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IYW returned +23.2% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 16.4 points.
  3. Cost. IYW charges 0.37% of assets a year and SCHG 0.04%, a gap of 0.33 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IYW flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IYW

IYW tracks an index of U.S. Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 65.1%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYW or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYW returned +23.2% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, IYW or SCHG?
SCHG is cheaper, by 0.33 percentage points a year. That is about $33 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYW and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of IYW and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IYW against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iyw-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.