Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FTEC vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FTEC returned +25.0% to SCHG's +6.8%; 45% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FTEC and SCHG

Net assets: $22.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+25.0%
FTEC total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
0.08%
FTEC expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHG costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.2 points.

FTEC vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTECSCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year+25.0%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high4.9%, high on Oct 6, 20263.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 IndexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.08%0.04%
Net assets, FTEC as of Sep 30, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026$22.1bn$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common45%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund62.2%51.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 677 weekly returns
FTEC SCHG
Return
Total return edge FTEC +1,178.5% +616.1%
Annualized edge FTEC +21.6% +16.3%
Price return edge FTEC +1,031.1% +546.8%
Risk
Volatility edge SCHG 21.3% 18.9%
Max drawdown edge Tie −34.1% −34.2%
Downside capture 100.0% 108.1%
Beta 1.00 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FTEC 0.94 0.79
Sortino edge FTEC 1.41 1.18
Treynor 0.199 0.138
Calmar edge FTEC 0.63 0.48
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.70 0.65
Information ratio −0.19 0.40
Tracking error 0.7% 5.5%

Each against its own benchmark: FTEC against VGT, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHG against IVV, Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FTEC returned more: +1,178.5% to +616.1%. SCHG swung less: 18.9% to 21.3%. FTEC and SCHG fell about the same at their worst: −34.1% and −34.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FTEC vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFTECSCHGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,178.5%+616.1%FTECPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+21.6%+16.3%FTECTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,031.1%+546.8%FTECPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.3%18.9%SCHGSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.1%12.7%SCHG (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−34.1%−34.2%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.7%121.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.0%108.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.001.10Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.940.79FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.411.18FTECReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1990.138Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.630.48FTECAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVGTIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year+0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.700.65Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.5% to +0.2%−1.7% to +3.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.190.40Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.7%5.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 677 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

45%

By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and SCHG hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

45% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FTEC SCHG
NVIDIA Corp 17.09% 10.67%
Apple Inc 16.21% 9.29%
Microsoft Corp 10.93% 7.52%
Broadcom Inc 4.20% 3.50%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.18% 2.37%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.17% 1.19%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.13% 1.65%
KLA Corp 1.02% 0.88%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 0.83% 0.91%
Arista Networks Inc 0.84% 0.78%
Salesforce Inc 0.65% 0.81%
ServiceNow Inc 0.49% 0.59%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FTEC
Micron Technology Inc 3.82%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.92%
Applied Materials Inc 1.69%
Intel Corp 1.65%
Lam Research Corp 1.54%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.07%
Oracle Corp 0.90%
International Business Machines Corp 0.88%
Only in SCHG
Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
Alphabet Inc 3.97%
Alphabet Inc 3.16%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.93%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.51%
Visa Inc 2.43%
Tesla Inc 2.37%
Mastercard Inc 1.83%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Information Technology Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +25.0% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +24.7% (VGT) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs VGT −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 94.7%
Holdings 281 192
Net assets, FTEC as of Sep 30, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 $22.1bn $63.0bn

FTEC and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-CEA4D31532

FTEC and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FTEC follows MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 45% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FTEC returned +25.0% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 18.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FTEC

FTEC tracks the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +24.7% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 281 positions, with the top ten at 62.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +25.0% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, FTEC or SCHG?
SCHG is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FTEC and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FTEC and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FTEC against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftec-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.