Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IYW vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IYW returned +23.2% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IYW and PDBC

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.0bn for iShares U.S. Technology ETF and $8.0bn for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

At a glance
+23.2%
IYW total return, 1 year
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
0.37%
IYW expense ratio
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IYW costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 32.4 points; IYW is 3.1 times larger.

IYW vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIYWPDBC
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.2%+55.6%
Drawdown
Below its high5.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 Technology RIC 22No index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.37%0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$25.0bn$8.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight94%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund65.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IYW and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IYW PDBC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IYW
NVIDIA 16.81%
APPLE 16.60%
MICROSOFT 13.07%
BROADCOM INC 3.14%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.04%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.02%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.73%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.38%
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Tracks an index of U.S. Technology Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +23.2% +55.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +54.6% (DBC)
Gap to its benchmark +10.1 pts vs IWB +1.0 pts vs DBC
Expense ratio 0.37% 0.59%
Holdings 150 1
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $25.0bn $8.0bn

IYW and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IYW and PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IYW

IYW tracks an index of U.S. Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 65.1%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYW or PDBC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYW returned +23.2% and PDBC +55.6%.
Which is cheaper, IYW or PDBC?
IYW is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IYW against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iyw-vs-pdbc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.