Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

PDBC vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PDBC returned +55.6% to VGT's +24.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PDBC and VGT

Net assets: $8.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF, and $154.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Information Tech ETF.

At a glance
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
+24.7%
VGT total return, 1 year
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio
0.09%
VGT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGT costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 30.9 points.

PDBC vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasurePDBCVGT
Return
Total return, 1 year+55.6%+24.7%
Drawdown
Below its high4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.59%0.09%
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026$8.0bn$154.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight87%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund63.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, PDBC and VGT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PDBC VGT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Only in VGT
NVIDIA Corp 17.58%
Apple Inc 15.91%
Microsoft Corp 11.16%
Micron Technology Inc 4.45%
Broadcom Inc 4.11%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.67%
Intel Corp 1.98%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.60%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF VGT Vanguard Information Tech ETF
Where it sits Commodity ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Information technology
Total return, 1 year +55.6% +24.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +54.6% (DBC) +25.0% (FTEC)
Gap to its benchmark +1.0 pts vs DBC −0.3 pts vs FTEC
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.09%
Holdings 1 320
Net assets, PDBC as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 $8.0bn $154.5bn

PDBC and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

VGT

VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PDBC or VGT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PDBC returned +55.6% and VGT +24.7%.
Which is cheaper, PDBC or VGT?
VGT is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PDBC against VGT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pdbc-vs-vgt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.