Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IYW vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IYW returned +23.2% to MINT's +4.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IYW and MINT

Net assets: $25.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares U.S. Technology ETF, and $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund.

At a glance
+23.2%
IYW total return, 1 year
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
0.37%
IYW expense ratio
0.36%
MINT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MINT costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.0 points.

IYW vs MINT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIYWMINT
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.2%+4.2%
Drawdown
Below its high5.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 Technology RIC 22No index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.37%0.36%
Net assets, IYW as of Oct 27, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026$25.0bn$16.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight94%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund65.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IYW and MINT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IYW MINT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IYW
NVIDIA 16.81%
APPLE 16.60%
MICROSOFT 13.07%
BROADCOM INC 3.14%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.04%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.02%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.73%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.38%
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
Issuer iShares PIMCO
What it is Tracks an index of U.S. Technology Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +23.2% +4.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +10.1 pts vs IWB not measured
Expense ratio 0.37% 0.36%
Holdings 150 977
Net assets, IYW as of Oct 27, 2026 and MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 $25.0bn $16.4bn

IYW and MINT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IYW flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IYW

IYW tracks an index of U.S. Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 65.1%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYW or MINT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYW returned +23.2% and MINT +4.2%.
Which is cheaper, IYW or MINT?
MINT is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IYW against MINT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iyw-vs-mint

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.