Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IYW vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IYW returned +23.2% to PULS's +4.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IYW and PULS

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.0bn for iShares U.S. Technology ETF and $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

At a glance
+23.2%
IYW total return, 1 year
+4.0%
PULS total return, 1 year
0.37%
IYW expense ratio
0.15%
PULS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

PULS costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.2 points; IYW is 1.3 times larger.

IYW vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIYWPULS
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.2%+4.0%
Drawdown
Below its high5.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 Technology RIC 22No index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.37%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$25.0bn$19.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight94%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund65.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IYW and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IYW PULS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IYW
NVIDIA 16.81%
APPLE 16.60%
MICROSOFT 13.07%
BROADCOM INC 3.14%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.04%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.02%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 2.73%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.38%
Only in PULS
PGIM ETF Trust 1.81%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.74%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.66%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.57%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.51%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUEBEC 0.51%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.43%
BROADCOM INC 0.43%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
Issuer iShares PGIM
What it is Tracks an index of U.S. Technology Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +23.2% +4.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +10.1 pts vs IWB not measured
Expense ratio 0.37% 0.15%
Holdings 150 553
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $25.0bn $19.8bn

IYW and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IYW and PULS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IYW

IYW tracks an index of U.S. Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 65.1%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PULS

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYW or PULS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYW returned +23.2% and PULS +4.0%.
Which is cheaper, IYW or PULS?
PULS is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IYW against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iyw-vs-puls

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.