Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PULS vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PULS returned +4.0% to XLK's +27.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PULS and XLK
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.8bn for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and $125.0bn for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLK costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 23.1 points; XLK is 6.3 times larger.
| Measure | PULS | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.0% | +27.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Technology Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $19.8bn | $125.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 64.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, PULS and XLK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
PULS and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
XLK
XLK tracks an index of Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PULS or XLK?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.0% and XLK +27.1%.
- Which is cheaper, PULS or XLK?
- XLK is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PULS against XLK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-xlk
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PULS against XLK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-xlk
[PULS against XLK (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/puls-vs-xlk)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.