Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MINT vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to XLK's +27.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MINT and XLK

Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $125.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
+27.1%
XLK total return, 1 year
0.36%
MINT expense ratio
0.08%
XLK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLK costs 0.28 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 22.9 points.

MINT vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMINTXLK
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.2%+27.1%
Drawdown
Below its high5.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedTechnology Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.36%0.08%
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and XLK as of Oct 27, 2026$16.4bn$125.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund64.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 27, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 882 weekly returns
MINT XLK
Return
Total return edge XLK +42.4% +2,006.9%
Annualized edge XLK +2.1% +19.7%
Price return edge XLK +0.5% +1,588.0%
Risk
Volatility edge MINT 1.1% 20.2%
Max drawdown edge MINT −4.6% −32.6%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge XLK 0.50 0.92
Sortino edge XLK 0.59 1.39
Calmar edge XLK 0.46 0.60
Reading

XLK returned more: +2,006.9% to +42.4%. MINT swung less: 1.1% to 20.2%. MINT fell less at its worst: −4.6% to −32.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MINT vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMINTXLKEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+42.4%+2,006.9%XLKPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+2.1%+19.7%XLKTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+0.5%+1,588.0%XLKPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility1.1%20.2%MINTSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation1.0%13.3%MINTLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−4.6%−32.6%MINTDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.500.92XLKReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.591.39XLKReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.460.60XLKAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 882 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and XLK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MINT XLK
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Only in XLK
NVIDIA CORP 15.22%
APPLE INC 14.62%
MICROSOFT CORP 11.38%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.78%
BROADCOM INC 4.70%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.02%
INTEL CORP 2.72%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC A 2.67%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Technology
Total return, 1 year +4.2% +27.1%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +13.5 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 0.36% 0.08%
Holdings 977 76
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and XLK as of Oct 27, 2026 $16.4bn $125.0bn

MINT and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

XLK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

XLK

XLK tracks an index of Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or XLK?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and XLK +27.1%.
Which is cheaper, MINT or XLK?
XLK is cheaper, by 0.28 percentage points a year. That is about $28 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MINT against XLK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-xlk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.