GARP · iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP and returned +29.5% over the past year.
Key facts
Its ten largest equity positions
| Holding | Ticker | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| KLA CORP | KLAC | 6.46% | |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | MU | 6.07% | |
| APPLE INC | AAPL | 4.44% | |
| NVIDIA CORP | NVDA | 4.16% | |
| MICROSOFT CORP | MSFT | 4.10% | |
| BROADCOM INC | AVGO | 3.96% | |
| LAM RESEARCH CORP | LRCX | 3.79% | |
| ELI LILLY & COMPANY | LLY | 3.73% | |
| VISA INC | V | 3.73% | |
| META PLATFORMS INC | META | 3.35% |
Compare GARP
Also against BIL, BINC, BITO, BND, BNDX, BOND, BOXX, BSV, BWET, CGBL, CGDV, CGGR, COWZ, CTA, DBMF, DFUS, DGRO, DGRW, DIA, DVY, DYNF, EDV, EEM, EFA, EMB, EMXC, EWJ, EWT, EWY, EWZ, EZU, FBCG, FDVV, FENI, FLKR, FNDX, FTEC, FXI, GDX, GLD, GLDM, GOVT, GRNY, HDV, HGER, HYG, HYMB, IALT, IAU, IBB, IDEV, IEF, IEFA, IEI, IEMG, IGIB, IGM, IGSB, IJH, IJR, IJS, IJT, ILF, INDA, ITOT, IUSB, IVV, IWB, IWC, IWD, IWF, IWM, IWO, IXUS, IYE, IYR, IYW, JAAA, JNK, KRE, LQD, LYTE, MAGS, MBB, MDY, MGK, MINT, MOAT, MTUM, MUB, NOBL, ONEQ, PDBC, PFF, PULS, PVAL, QQQ, QQQM, QUAL, RDVY, REMX, RSP, SCHB, SCHD, SCHF, SCHG, SCHH, SCHP, SCHX, SDY, SGOV, SHV, SHY, SIVR, SLV, SPHD, SPHQ, SPLG, SPMO, SPSB, SPY, SPYD, SPYG, TIP, TLT, URTH, USFR, USHY, USMV, USO, VB, VBIL, VBK, VBR, VCIT, VCLT, VCSH, VDC, VDE, VEA, VEU, VGIT, VGK, VGLT, VGSH, VGT, VHT, VIG, VLUE, VNQ, VO, VOE, VONG, VOO, VOOG, VOX, VPL, VPU, VT, VTEB, VTI, VTIP, VTV, VTWO, VUG, VUSB, VWO, VXF, VXUS, VYM, VYMI, XBI, XHB, XLB, XLC, XLE, XLF, XLG, XLI, XLK, XLP, XLRE, XLU, XLV, XLY, XOP, XOVR, XRT.
Period by period
| Window | Total return | S&P 500 | Gap to S&P 500 | Gap to Nasdaq-100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | +4.4% | +3.3% | +1.1 pts | +5.2 pts |
| 6 months | +26.5% | +16.0% | +10.5 pts | +5.8 pts |
| 1 year | +29.5% | +17.5% | +12.0 pts | +6.5 pts |
| 3 years | +127.8% | +77.9% | +50.0 pts | +32.8 pts |
| Since listing | +245.6% | +153.5% | +92.0 pts | +11.1 pts |
In plain words
GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
| What it tracks | MSCI USA Quality GARP |
|---|---|
| Fund type | Index equity fund |
| Expense ratio (485BPOS XBRL, Jul 27, 2026) | 0.15% |
| Price | $83.08 |
| Listed since | Jan 16, 2020 |
| Net assets (SEC filing, whole fund, as filed for Jun 30, 2026) | $2.5bn |
| Below its high (ETFIQ) | −2.5% |
| Holdings | 131 |
| Top ten weight | 43.8% |
| Holdings as of (SEC N-PORT) | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Already in the S&P 500, by weight (ETFIQ) | 94.4% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 (ETFIQ) | 58.6% |
| Already in the Nasdaq-100, by weight (ETFIQ) | 63.9% |
Questions people ask
- How has GARP performed?
- Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, GARP returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500. Over three years the figure is +127.8%.
- What does GARP cost?
- The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
- What does GARP hold?
- 131 positions as filed for Jun 30, 2026, with the top ten at 43.8% of the fund. 94% of its weight is in stocks the S&P 500 also holds.
- How far is GARP below its high?
- 2.5% below its high of Aug 13, 2026, measured on the reinvested series to Sep 11, 2026.
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Funds near this one
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP, core index fund, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/funds/GARP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ covers leveraged and inverse, thematic, buffer, option-income, core index and spot crypto ETFs. This fund is here because the other funds here are measured against it and portfolios hold it. ETFIQ is an independent publisher and makes no recommendations. Standards and sources