Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs GARP: how they differ

DYNF and GARP hold 37% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and GARP hold 37% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and GARP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFGARP
Apple Inc7.75%4.44%
NVIDIA Corp8.62%4.16%
Microsoft Corp5.35%4.10%
Broadcom Inc3.25%3.96%
Alphabet Inc2.87%2.88%
Lam Research Corp2.71%3.79%
Meta Platforms Inc2.50%3.35%
Amazon.com Inc4.42%1.49%
Micron Technology Inc1.35%6.07%
Netflix Inc1.17%2.85%
Palantir Technologies Inc1.17%1.78%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc1.14%2.21%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in GARP
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59%KLA CORP 6.46%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.76%ADOBE INC 2.71%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.38%MASTERCARD INC 1.63%
Exxon Mobil Corp 1.93%ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD 1.46%
Johnson & Johnson 1.92%MERCADOLIBRE INC 1.40%
Tesla Inc 1.74%QUANTA SERVICES INC 1.37%
Duke Energy Corp 1.63%ARISTA NETWORKS INC 1.27%
Bank of America Corp 1.59%AIRBNB INC 1.10%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DYNF and GARP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveMSCI USA Quality GARP
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+29.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts+12.0 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%94.4%
Holdings187131

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or GARP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and GARP returned +29.5%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or GARP?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and GARP charges 0.15%, so GARP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and GARP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 94% of GARP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 37% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against GARP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against GARP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-GARP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources