Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GARP vs RDVY: how they differ

GARP and RDVY hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and RDVY hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GARP and RDVY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGARPRDVY
KLA CORP6.46%4.14%
LAM RESEARCH CORP3.79%4.42%
GE AEROSPACE2.13%2.13%
ALPHABET INC2.88%2.12%
NVIDIA CORP4.16%1.91%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC6.07%1.83%
VISA INC3.73%1.82%
META PLATFORMS INC3.35%1.50%
MICROSOFT CORP4.10%1.45%
APPLE INC4.44%1.44%
MASTERCARD INC1.63%1.19%
CITIGROUP INC0.62%0.54%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GARPOnly in RDVY
BROADCOM INC 3.96%APPLIED MATERIALS INC 4.69%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.73%BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP (THE) 2.15%
FORTINET INC 3.16%WILLIAMS SONOMA INC 2.12%
NETFLIX INC 2.85%ROSS STORES INC 2.01%
ADOBE INC 2.71%ALLSTATE CORP (THE) 2.01%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 2.21%TRAVELERS COMPANIES INC (THE) 2.00%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.78%SNAP-ON INC 2.00%
AMAZON.COM INC 1.49%CHUBB LTD (SWITZERLAND) 1.97%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

GARP and RDVY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesFirst Trust
What it isMSCI USA Quality GARPFirst Rising Dividend Achievers
Total return, 1 year+29.5%+22.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+12.0 pts+4.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.47%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%94.4%
Holdings13171

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

RDVY in plain words

RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 71 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or RDVY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and RDVY returned +22.0%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GARP or RDVY?
GARP charges 0.15% a year and RDVY charges 0.47%, so GARP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and RDVY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 94% of RDVY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 27% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GARP against RDVY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against RDVY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GARP-RDVY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources