Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GARP vs VONG: how they differ

GARP and VONG hold 49% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and VONG hold 49% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GARP and VONG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGARPVONG
APPLE INC4.44%11.97%
NVIDIA CORP4.16%13.09%
MICROSOFT CORP4.10%8.98%
BROADCOM INC3.96%5.78%
META PLATFORMS INC3.35%3.20%
ALPHABET INC2.88%3.91%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY3.73%2.67%
VISA INC3.73%1.57%
AMAZON.COM INC1.49%5.07%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC2.21%1.47%
LAM RESEARCH CORP3.79%1.21%
MASTERCARD INC1.63%1.20%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GARPOnly in VONG
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 6.07%Tesla Inc 3.48%
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD 1.46%Costco Wholesale Corp 1.28%
MERCADOLIBRE INC 1.40%AbbVie Inc 1.16%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC 0.59%Home Depot Inc/The 0.73%
TERADYNE INC 0.53%Coca-Cola Co/The 0.45%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.49%Intuitive Surgical Inc 0.45%
COEUR MINING INC 0.31%Amgen Inc 0.40%
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP 0.30%Texas Instruments Inc 0.34%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

GARP and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI USA Quality GARPRussell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+29.5%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+12.0 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%95.6%
Holdings131387

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or VONG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and VONG returned +7.2%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GARP or VONG?
GARP charges 0.15% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 49% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GARP against VONG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GARP-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources