Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GARP vs ITOT: how they differ

GARP and ITOT hold 39% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and ITOT hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GARP and ITOT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGARPITOT
APPLE INC4.44%5.82%
NVIDIA CORP4.16%6.64%
MICROSOFT CORP4.10%3.80%
ALPHABET INC2.88%2.87%
BROADCOM INC3.96%2.45%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC6.07%1.78%
META PLATFORMS INC3.35%1.70%
AMAZON.COM INC1.49%3.20%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY3.73%1.30%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC2.21%1.30%
ALPHABET INC0.91%2.29%
VISA INC3.73%0.78%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GARPOnly in ITOT
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD 1.46%Tesla, Inc. 1.62%
MERCADOLIBRE INC 1.40%Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. 1.26%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.49%JPMorgan Chase & Co. 1.20%
FLUTTER ENTERTAINMENT PLC 0.26%Intel Corp. 0.90%
FABRINET 0.14%Johnson & Johnson 0.84%
EVEREST GROUP LTD 0.11%Applied Materials, Inc. 0.79%
CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING LTD 0.11%Exxon Mobil Corp. 0.78%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.10%Walmart, Inc. 0.68%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

GARP and ITOT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isMSCI USA Quality GARPCore S&P Total U.S. Stock Market
Total return, 1 year+29.5%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+12.0 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%88.3%
Holdings1312497

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or ITOT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and ITOT returned +17.2%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GARP or ITOT?
GARP charges 0.15% a year and ITOT charges 0.03%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and ITOT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 88% of ITOT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 39% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GARP against ITOT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against ITOT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GARP-ITOT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources