Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AIRR vs ITOT: how they differ
Over the year ITOT returned more, +17.2% against +15.0%, and ITOT charges 0.03% against 0.69%.
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AIRR and ITOT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | AIRR | ITOT |
|---|---|---|
| COMFORT SYSTEMS USA INC | 4.42% | 0.10% |
| EMCOR GROUP INC | 3.75% | 0.05% |
| MASTEC INC | 4.18% | 0.04% |
| STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC | 6.00% | 0.04% |
| CH ROBINSON WORLDWIDE INC | 4.08% | 0.03% |
| RBC BEARINGS INC | 1.85% | 0.03% |
| BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC | 2.97% | 0.02% |
| DYCOM INDUSTRIES INC | 3.76% | 0.02% |
| CLEAN HARBORS INC | 2.44% | 0.02% |
| MUELLER INDUSTRIES INC | 1.37% | 0.02% |
| OWENS CORNING | 3.90% | 0.02% |
| APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC | 1.80% | 0.02% |
| Only in AIRR | Only in ITOT |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. 6.64% | |
| Apple, Inc. 5.82% | |
| Microsoft Corp. 3.80% | |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 3.20% | |
| Alphabet, Inc. 2.87% | |
| Broadcom, Inc. 2.45% | |
| Alphabet, Inc. 2.29% | |
| Micron Technology, Inc. 1.78% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Thematic ETF | Core index fund |
| Issuer | First Trust | iShares |
| What it is | Reshoring and manufacturing | Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.0% | +17.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −2.5 pts | −0.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 5.5% | 88.3% |
| Holdings | 58 | 2497 |
AIRR in plain words
By weight, 6% of AIRR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 30% of the fund across 58 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +15.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 2.5 pts. It sits 19.5% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
ITOT in plain words
ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AIRR or ITOT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AIRR returned +15.0% and ITOT returned +17.2%, so ITOT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AIRR or ITOT?
- AIRR charges 0.69% a year and ITOT charges 0.03%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do AIRR and ITOT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 6% of AIRR and 88% of ITOT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
- Are AIRR and ITOT the same kind of fund?
- No. AIRR is a thematic ETF and ITOT is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AIRR against ITOT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AIRR-ITOT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources