Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBCG vs GARP: how they differ

FBCG and GARP hold 39% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBCG and GARP hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FBCG and GARP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFBCGGARP
APPLE INC9.64%4.44%
NVIDIA CORP14.62%4.16%
MICROSOFT CORP5.20%4.10%
BROADCOM INC3.74%3.96%
META PLATFORMS INC3.90%3.35%
ALPHABET INC9.10%2.88%
ELI LILLY and CO2.25%3.73%
NETFLIX INC2.23%2.85%
AMAZON.COM INC8.43%1.49%
APPLOVIN CORP1.26%0.83%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC0.82%6.07%
MASTERCARD INC0.81%1.63%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FBCGOnly in GARP
TESLA INC 1.45%FORTINET INC 3.16%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 1.19%ADOBE INC 2.71%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.12%ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD 1.46%
CELESTICA INC 0.88%MERCADOLIBRE INC 1.40%
LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC 0.82%QUANTA SERVICES INC 1.37%
SANDISK CORP/DE 0.82%AIRBNB INC 1.10%
GILEAD SCIENCES INC 0.69%ALPHABET INC 0.91%
SHARKNINJA INC 0.67%PHILLIPS 66 0.88%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FBCG and GARP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityiShares
What it isBlue Chip GrowthMSCI USA Quality GARP
Total return, 1 year+17.3%+29.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.2 pts+12.0 pts
Expense ratio0.57%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50086.8%94.4%
Holdings214131

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBCG or GARP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBCG returned +17.3% and GARP returned +29.5%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FBCG or GARP?
FBCG charges 0.57% a year and GARP charges 0.15%, so GARP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FBCG and GARP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FBCG and 94% of GARP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 39% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBCG against GARP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBCG against GARP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FBCG-GARP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources