Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GARP vs IGM: how they differ

GARP and IGM hold 48% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and IGM hold 48% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GARP and IGM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGARPIGM
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC6.07%5.47%
APPLE INC4.44%7.92%
NVIDIA CORP4.16%7.97%
MICROSOFT CORP4.10%7.50%
BROADCOM INC3.96%7.61%
META PLATFORMS INC3.35%4.17%
ALPHABET INC2.88%4.45%
LAM RESEARCH CORP3.79%2.37%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC2.21%4.13%
KLA CORP6.46%1.72%
NETFLIX INC2.85%1.31%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC1.78%1.17%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GARPOnly in IGM
ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.73%Intel Corp. 2.88%
VISA INC 3.73%Applied Materials, Inc. 2.50%
GE AEROSPACE 2.13%Cisco Systems, Inc. 2.02%
MASTERCARD INC 1.63%Sandisk Corp. 1.47%
AMAZON.COM INC 1.49%Texas Instruments, Inc. 1.18%
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD 1.46%International Business Machines Corp. 1.15%
MERCADOLIBRE INC 1.40%Western Digital Corp. 0.96%
QUANTA SERVICES INC 1.37%Seagate Technology Holdings plc 0.94%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

GARP and IGM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isMSCI USA Quality GARPExpanded Tech Sector
Total return, 1 year+29.5%+32.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+12.0 pts+15.2 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.37%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%92.0%
Holdings131295

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

IGM in plain words

IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or IGM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and IGM returned +32.7%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GARP or IGM?
GARP charges 0.15% a year and IGM charges 0.37%, so GARP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and IGM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 92% of IGM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 48% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GARP against IGM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against IGM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GARP-IGM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources