Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GARP vs URTH: how they differ

GARP and URTH hold 34% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and URTH hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GARP and URTH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGARPURTH
APPLE INC4.44%5.04%
NVIDIA CORP4.16%5.64%
MICROSOFT CORP4.10%3.50%
ALPHABET INC2.88%2.43%
BROADCOM INC3.96%2.21%
META PLATFORMS INC3.35%1.51%
AMAZON.COM INC1.49%2.86%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC6.07%1.20%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY3.73%0.97%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC2.21%0.92%
ALPHABET INC0.91%2.01%
VISA INC3.73%0.60%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GARPOnly in URTH
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD 1.46%TESLA, INC. 1.35%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.49%JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 0.90%
FLUTTER ENTERTAINMENT PLC 0.26%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 0.72%
FABRINET 0.14%ASML Holding N.V. 0.69%
EVEREST GROUP LTD 0.11%EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 0.67%
CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING LTD 0.11%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.60%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.10%INTEL CORPORATION 0.57%
CARNIVAL CORP LTD 0.10%WALMART INC. 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

GARP and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isMSCI USA Quality GARPMSCI World
Total return, 1 year+29.5%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+12.0 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.24%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%70.3%
Holdings1311322

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1322 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or URTH?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and URTH returned +17.4%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GARP or URTH?
GARP charges 0.15% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so GARP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 34% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GARP against URTH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against URTH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GARP-URTH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources