Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GARP vs XLI: how they differ

GARP and XLI hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and XLI hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GARP and XLI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGARPXLI
GE AEROSPACE2.13%6.77%
QUANTA SERVICES INC1.37%1.88%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC0.70%2.55%
HOWMET AEROSPACE INC0.69%1.87%
EMCOR GROUP INC0.47%0.64%
COMFORT SYSTEMS USA INC0.44%1.21%
VERTIV HOLDINGS COMPANY0.33%2.23%
GE VERNOVA INC0.29%5.48%
JACOBS SOLUTIONS INC0.19%0.26%
AXON ENTERPRISE INC0.12%0.79%
DELTA AIR LINES INC0.08%1.06%
UNITED AIRLINES HOLDINGS INC0.06%0.77%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GARPOnly in XLI
KLA CORP 6.46%Caterpillar Inc 8.52%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 6.07%RTX Corp 4.44%
APPLE INC 4.44%Boeing Co/The 2.96%
NVIDIA CORP 4.16%Eaton Corp PLC 2.87%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.10%Union Pacific Corp 2.81%
BROADCOM INC 3.96%Deere & Co 2.77%
LAM RESEARCH CORP 3.79%Parker-Hannifin Corp 2.14%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.73%Trane Technologies PLC 1.89%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

GARP and XLI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
XLI
State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isMSCI USA Quality GARPIndustrials
Total return, 1 year+29.5%+14.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+12.0 pts−3.3 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%100.0%
Holdings13181

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

XLI in plain words

XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 41.4%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or XLI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and XLI returned +14.3%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GARP or XLI?
GARP charges 0.15% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so XLI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GARP against XLI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against XLI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GARP-XLI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources