Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRW vs GARP: how they differ

DGRW and GARP hold 30% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and GARP hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRW and GARP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGRWGARP
NVIDIA CORP7.95%4.16%
MICROSOFT CORP5.75%4.10%
APPLE INC3.87%4.44%
META PLATFORMS INC2.97%3.35%
BROADCOM INC2.34%3.96%
ALPHABET INC2.31%2.88%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY1.53%3.73%
VISA INC1.41%3.73%
ORACLE CORP2.34%1.18%
ALPHABET INC2.32%0.91%
LAM RESEARCH CORP0.90%3.79%
GE AEROSPACE0.63%2.13%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGRWOnly in GARP
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 6.07%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%FORTINET INC 3.16%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%NETFLIX INC 2.85%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%ADOBE INC 2.71%
ABBVIE INC 2.07%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 2.21%
CATERPILLAR INC 1.80%PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.78%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 1.71%AMAZON.COM INC 1.49%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.59%ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD 1.46%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

DGRW and GARP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerWisdomTreeiShares
What it isU.S. Quality Dividend GrowthMSCI USA Quality GARP
Total return, 1 year+12.4%+29.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−5.1 pts+12.0 pts
Expense ratio0.28%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%94.4%
Holdings197131

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or GARP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.4% and GARP returned +29.5%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or GARP?
DGRW charges 0.28% a year and GARP charges 0.15%, so GARP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRW and GARP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of DGRW and 94% of GARP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 30% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRW against GARP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRW against GARP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRW-GARP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources