Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GARP vs XOVR: how they differ

GARP and XOVR hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and XOVR hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GARP and XOVR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGARPXOVR
NVIDIA CORP4.16%9.48%
META PLATFORMS INC3.35%4.47%
ALPHABET INC2.88%6.53%
ARISTA NETWORKS INC1.27%2.31%
APPLOVIN CORP0.83%3.95%
DOORDASH INC0.62%2.04%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC1.78%0.56%
ROCKET LAB CORP0.24%2.50%
RESMED INC0.22%1.36%
ROBINHOOD MARKETS INC0.20%3.56%
ASTERA LABS INC0.15%7.75%
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC0.15%1.77%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GARPOnly in XOVR
KLA CORP 6.46%Veeva Systems Inc 3.17%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 6.07%Roku Inc 2.16%
APPLE INC 4.44%Tempus Ai Inc 2.06%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.10%Exelixis Inc 1.89%
BROADCOM INC 3.96%Virtu Financial Inc 1.86%
LAM RESEARCH CORP 3.79%Draftkings Inc 1.81%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.73%Medpace Holdings Inc 1.67%
VISA INC 3.73%Tesla Inc 1.63%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

GARP and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
XOVR
ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesERShares
What it isMSCI USA Quality GARPPrivate-Public Crossover
Total return, 1 year+29.5%0.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+12.0 pts−17.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.75%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%43.4%
Holdings13132

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

XOVR in plain words

XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or XOVR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GARP or XOVR?
GARP charges 0.15% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so GARP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 15% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GARP against XOVR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GARP-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources