Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs GARP: how they differ

FNDX and GARP hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and GARP hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FNDX and GARP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFNDXGARP
Apple Inc4.64%4.44%
Alphabet Inc2.38%2.88%
Microsoft Corp2.33%4.10%
Micron Technology Inc1.60%6.07%
Amazon.com Inc1.86%1.49%
Meta Platforms Inc1.24%3.35%
Alphabet Inc1.90%0.91%
Broadcom Inc0.65%3.96%
Citigroup Inc0.85%0.62%
NVIDIA Corp0.55%4.16%
Phillips 660.47%0.88%
Lam Research Corp0.41%3.79%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDXOnly in GARP
Intel Corp 2.57%PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.78%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD 1.46%
Chevron Corp 1.49%MERCADOLIBRE INC 1.40%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.41%APPLOVIN CORP 0.83%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.38%DOORDASH INC 0.62%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.37%SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.49%
Walmart Inc 1.01%COMFORT SYSTEMS USA INC 0.44%
Verizon Communications Inc 0.99%CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC 0.44%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FNDX and GARP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabiShares
What it isFundamental U.S. Large CompanyMSCI USA Quality GARP
Total return, 1 year+26.1%+29.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.6 pts+12.0 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50091.2%94.4%
Holdings733131

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or GARP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and GARP returned +29.5%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or GARP?
FNDX charges 0.25% a year and GARP charges 0.15%, so GARP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and GARP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 94% of GARP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against GARP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against GARP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FNDX-GARP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources