Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GARP vs VOOG: how they differ

GARP and VOOG hold 47% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and VOOG hold 47% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GARP and VOOG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGARPVOOG
APPLE INC4.44%6.38%
NVIDIA CORP4.16%14.29%
MICROSOFT CORP4.10%9.31%
BROADCOM INC3.96%5.90%
META PLATFORMS INC3.35%3.85%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC6.07%3.04%
ALPHABET INC2.88%6.17%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY3.73%2.44%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC2.21%2.34%
AMAZON.COM INC1.49%3.90%
LAM RESEARCH CORP3.79%1.11%
NETFLIX INC2.85%1.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GARPOnly in VOOG
ADOBE INC 2.71%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.42%
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD 1.46%Tesla Inc 2.12%
MERCADOLIBRE INC 1.40%JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.43%
PHILLIPS 66 0.88%Caterpillar Inc 1.14%
CITIGROUP INC 0.62%Applied Materials Inc 0.99%
DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC 0.61%Johnson & Johnson 0.89%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 0.59%Cisco Systems Inc 0.70%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC 0.59%Sandisk Corp/DE 0.70%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

GARP and VOOG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI USA Quality GARPS&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+29.5%+17.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+12.0 pts+0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%100.0%
Holdings131146

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

VOOG in plain words

VOOG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or VOOG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and VOOG returned +17.8%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GARP or VOOG?
GARP charges 0.15% a year and VOOG charges 0.05%, so VOOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and VOOG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 100% of VOOG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 47% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GARP against VOOG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against VOOG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GARP-VOOG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources