Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GARP vs GRNY: how they differ

GARP and GRNY hold 33% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and GRNY hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GARP and GRNY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGARPGRNY
BROADCOM INC3.96%2.94%
ALPHABET INC2.88%2.96%
NETFLIX INC2.85%2.82%
KLA CORP6.46%2.75%
NVIDIA CORP4.16%2.46%
APPLE INC4.44%2.40%
MICROSOFT CORP4.10%2.38%
META PLATFORMS INC3.35%2.24%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC2.21%4.17%
GE AEROSPACE2.13%2.04%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC1.78%2.33%
AMAZON.COM INC1.49%3.02%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GARPOnly in GRNY
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 6.07%Strategy Inc 3.01%
LAM RESEARCH CORP 3.79%Caterpillar Inc 2.69%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.73%Bank of New York Mellon Corp/T 2.59%
VISA INC 3.73%Eaton Corp PLC 2.56%
FORTINET INC 3.16%ONEOK Inc 2.49%
ADOBE INC 2.71%Air Products and Chemicals Inc 2.48%
MASTERCARD INC 1.63%Chevron Corp 2.46%
AMPHENOL CORP 1.52%Union Pacific Corp 2.39%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

GARP and GRNY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesFundstrat
What it isMSCI USA Quality GARPFundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap
Total return, 1 year+29.5%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+12.0 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.75%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%97.0%
Holdings13140

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or GRNY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and GRNY returned +13.8%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GARP or GRNY?
GARP charges 0.15% a year and GRNY charges 0.75%, so GARP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and GRNY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 97% of GRNY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 33% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GARP against GRNY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against GRNY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GARP-GRNY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources