Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GARP vs USMV: how they differ

GARP and USMV hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and USMV hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GARP and USMV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGARPUSMV
NVIDIA CORP4.16%1.64%
MICROSOFT CORP4.10%1.56%
AMPHENOL CORP1.52%1.51%
MASTERCARD INC1.63%1.15%
VISA INC3.73%0.94%
APPLE INC4.44%0.82%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY3.73%0.66%
AUTODESK INC0.58%0.67%
ADOBE INC2.71%0.57%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC2.21%0.53%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC0.65%0.53%
ARISTA NETWORKS INC1.27%0.52%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GARPOnly in USMV
KLA CORP 6.46%CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.81%
LAM RESEARCH CORP 3.79%EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%
ALPHABET INC 2.88%DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55%
GE AEROSPACE 2.13%THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53%
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD 1.46%Chubb Limited 1.50%
QUANTA SERVICES INC 1.37%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1.49%
AIRBNB INC 1.10%WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. 1.48%
PHILLIPS 66 0.88%MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. 1.46%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

GARP and USMV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isMSCI USA Quality GARPMSCI USA Min Vol Factor
Total return, 1 year+29.5%+6.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+12.0 pts−10.9 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%94.8%
Holdings131170

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

USMV in plain words

USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or USMV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and USMV returned +6.6%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GARP or USMV?
GARP charges 0.15% a year and USMV charges 0.15%, so GARP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and USMV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 95% of USMV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 18% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GARP against USMV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against USMV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GARP-USMV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources