Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GARP vs XLK: how they differ

GARP and XLK hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and XLK returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and XLK hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GARP and XLK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGARPXLK
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC6.07%5.42%
APPLE INC4.44%12.86%
NVIDIA CORP4.16%14.66%
MICROSOFT CORP4.10%8.38%
BROADCOM INC3.96%5.41%
LAM RESEARCH CORP3.79%3.02%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC2.21%5.28%
KLA CORP6.46%2.20%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC1.78%1.49%
AMPHENOL CORP1.52%1.21%
ORACLE CORP1.18%1.39%
ARISTA NETWORKS INC1.27%0.98%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GARPOnly in XLK
ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.73%Intel Corp 3.68%
VISA INC 3.73%Applied Materials Inc 3.20%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.35%Cisco Systems Inc 2.59%
ALPHABET INC 2.88%Sandisk Corp 1.88%
NETFLIX INC 2.85%Texas Instruments Inc 1.51%
GE AEROSPACE 2.13%International Business Machines Corp 1.47%
MASTERCARD INC 1.63%Western Digital Corp 1.23%
AMAZON.COM INC 1.49%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.21%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

GARP and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
XLK
State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isMSCI USA Quality GARPTechnology
Total return, 1 year+29.5%+39.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+12.0 pts+21.7 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%100.0%
Holdings13174

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

XLK in plain words

XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or XLK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GARP or XLK?
GARP charges 0.15% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 42% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GARP against XLK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against XLK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GARP-XLK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources