Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GARP vs ONEQ: how they differ

GARP and ONEQ hold 38% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and ONEQ hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GARP and ONEQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGARPONEQ
APPLE INC4.44%10.04%
NVIDIA CORP4.16%11.24%
MICROSOFT CORP4.10%7.32%
BROADCOM INC3.96%4.64%
META PLATFORMS INC3.35%3.03%
ALPHABET INC2.88%4.85%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC6.07%2.38%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC2.21%1.84%
AMAZON.COM INC1.49%6.37%
ALPHABET INC0.91%4.48%
LAM RESEARCH CORP3.79%0.87%
NETFLIX INC2.85%0.79%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GARPOnly in ONEQ
ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.73%TESLA INC 3.58%
VISA INC 3.73%WALMART INC 2.02%
GE AEROSPACE 2.13%INTEL CORP 1.25%
MASTERCARD INC 1.63%CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.04%
AMPHENOL CORP 1.52%COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 0.93%
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD 1.46%APPLIED MATERIALS INC 0.78%
QUANTA SERVICES INC 1.37%TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC. 0.60%
ARISTA NETWORKS INC 1.27%QUALCOMM INC 0.58%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

GARP and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesFidelity
What it isMSCI USA Quality GARPNasdaq Composite
Total return, 1 year+29.5%+20.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+12.0 pts+3.1 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.21%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%87.4%
Holdings1311022

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or ONEQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GARP or ONEQ?
GARP charges 0.15% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so GARP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 38% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GARP against ONEQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GARP-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources