Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AOR vs ONEQ: how they differ
AOR and ONEQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AOR and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in AOR | Only in ONEQ |
|---|---|
| iShares Core S&P 500 ETF 35.07% | NVIDIA CORP 11.24% |
| iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF 32.09% | APPLE INC 10.04% |
| iShares Core MSCI International Develope 17.02% | MICROSOFT CORP 7.32% |
| iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF 7.29% | AMAZON.COM INC 6.37% |
| iShares Core International Aggregate Bon 5.57% | ALPHABET INC 4.85% |
| iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF 1.99% | BROADCOM INC 4.64% |
| iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF 0.96% | ALPHABET INC 4.48% |
| TESLA INC 3.58% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| What it is | Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation | Nasdaq Composite |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.3% | +20.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −6.2 pts | +3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.21% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 87.4% |
| Holdings | 7 | 1022 |
AOR in plain words
AOR is an index equity fund tracking the Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
ONEQ in plain words
ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AOR or ONEQ?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +11.3% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AOR or ONEQ?
- AOR charges 0.15% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so AOR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do AOR and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AOR and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AOR against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AOR-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources