Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
GARP vs GLDM: how they differ
GARP is an equity index fund and GLDM a commodity fund, and over the year GARP returned more, +29.5% against +19.4%.
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust.
| GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI USA Quality GARP | Gold MiniShares |
| Total return, 1 year | +29.5% | +19.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +12.0 pts | +1.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | not published |
| Holdings | 131 | not filed |
GARP in plain words
GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
GLDM in plain words
GLDM is a commodity fund tracking the Gold MiniShares. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 19.4% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GARP or GLDM?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and GLDM returned +19.4%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against GLDM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GARP-GLDM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources