Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or GLDM?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and GLDM returned +19.4%, so GLDM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs GLDM: how they differ

ACWI is an equity index fund and GLDM a commodity fund, and over the year they finished level, +19.1% against +19.4%.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust.

ACWI and GLDM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	MSCI ACWI	Gold MiniShares
Total return, 1 year	+19.1%	+19.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+1.6 pts	+1.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.32%	not published
Holdings	2307	not filed

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

GLDM in plain words

GLDM is a commodity fund tracking the Gold MiniShares. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 19.4% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or GLDM?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and GLDM returned +19.4%, so GLDM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against GLDM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against GLDM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-GLDM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources