Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GARP vs SPMO: how they differ

GARP and SPMO hold 34% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and SPMO hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GARP and SPMO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGARPSPMO
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC6.07%10.72%
NVIDIA CORP4.16%8.46%
BROADCOM INC3.96%7.58%
LAM RESEARCH CORP3.79%3.54%
ALPHABET INC2.88%4.81%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC2.21%4.14%
GE AEROSPACE2.13%1.63%
KLA CORP6.46%1.39%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC1.78%1.39%
AMPHENOL CORP1.52%1.30%
ALPHABET INC0.91%3.81%
CITIGROUP INC0.62%0.97%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GARPOnly in SPMO
APPLE INC 4.44%Johnson & Johnson 3.85%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.10%Intel Corp. 2.95%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.73%Exxon Mobil Corp. 2.78%
VISA INC 3.73%Caterpillar Inc. 2.60%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.35%Sandisk Corp. 2.46%
FORTINET INC 3.16%Cisco Systems, Inc. 2.02%
NETFLIX INC 2.85%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.88%
ADOBE INC 2.71%Applied Materials, Inc. 1.77%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

GARP and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesInvesco
What it isMSCI USA Quality GARPS&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year+29.5%+24.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+12.0 pts+7.0 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.13%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%100.0%
Holdings13199

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or SPMO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GARP or SPMO?
GARP charges 0.15% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 34% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GARP against SPMO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GARP-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources