Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GARP vs QUAL: how they differ

GARP and QUAL hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and GARP returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and QUAL hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GARP and QUAL both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGARPQUAL
APPLE INC4.44%6.28%
NVIDIA CORP4.16%6.52%
MICROSOFT CORP4.10%5.05%
META PLATFORMS INC3.35%3.50%
LAM RESEARCH CORP3.79%3.23%
VISA INC3.73%3.09%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY3.73%2.92%
KLA CORP6.46%2.79%
ALPHABET INC2.88%2.54%
NETFLIX INC2.85%2.00%
MASTERCARD INC1.63%2.30%
ARISTA NETWORKS INC1.27%1.49%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GARPOnly in QUAL
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 6.07%THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. 3.19%
BROADCOM INC 3.96%CATERPILLAR INC. 2.52%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 2.21%APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2.45%
GE AEROSPACE 2.13%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.12%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.78%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.92%
AMPHENOL CORP 1.52%SLB N.V. 1.56%
AMAZON.COM INC 1.49%QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 1.42%
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD 1.46%COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 1.31%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

GARP and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isMSCI USA Quality GARPMSCI USA Quality Factor
Total return, 1 year+29.5%+16.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+12.0 pts−1.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%98.9%
Holdings131121

GARP in plain words

GARP is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +29.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or QUAL?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +29.5% and QUAL returned +16.0%, so GARP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GARP or QUAL?
GARP charges 0.15% a year and QUAL charges 0.15%, so GARP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and QUAL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 99% of QUAL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 42% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GARP against QUAL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GARP against QUAL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GARP-QUAL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources